Android: adds "test_runner.py perf -vvv --single-step" in telemetry.py

Android: adds "test_runner.py perf -vvv --single-step" in telemetry.py

Buildbot side of https://codereview.chromium.org/66373004/.
This will allow chromium.perf to use roughly the same mechanism as
downstream bots.

BUG=
R=frankf@chromium.org, stip@chromium.org, tonyg@chromium.org

Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=234526

[bulach, 2013-11-08 15:09:04]

ptal

[tonyg, 2013-11-08 15:27:26]

lgtm

[ghost stip (do not use), 2013-11-11 21:54:49]

lgtm, but wait for https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/66373004/ to land
successfully

[frankf, 2013-11-11 22:01:52]

lgtm w/ a question

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/62563003/diff/1/scripts/slave/telemetr...
File scripts/slave/telemetry.py (right):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/62563003/diff/1/scripts/slave/telemetr...
scripts/slave/telemetry.py:93: wrapper_args =
['src/build/android/test_runner.py', 'perf', '-vvv',
nit: Do you really want to log at DEBUG level? We use INFO for functional tests.

[ghost stip (do not use), 2013-11-11 22:29:10]

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/62563003/diff/1/scripts/slave/telemetr...
File scripts/slave/telemetry.py (right):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/62563003/diff/1/scripts/slave/telemetr...
scripts/slave/telemetry.py:84: commands = [['adb', 'root'], ['adb',
'wait-for-device']]
do we need to have lines 81-86 here since we're now calling into test_runner.py?

[bulach, 2013-11-12 14:00:34]

thanks both! all comments addressed.. tony, would you mind pinging when you're
around? I'd truly appreciate if you could help me babysit this patch, should
anything need chromium.perf intervention..

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/62563003/diff/1/scripts/slave/telemetr...
File scripts/slave/telemetry.py (right):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/62563003/diff/1/scripts/slave/telemetr...
scripts/slave/telemetry.py:84: commands = [['adb', 'root'], ['adb',
'wait-for-device']]
On 2013/11/11 22:29:11, stip wrote:
> do we need to have lines 81-86 here since we're now calling into
test_runner.py?

oh, good point! done.

[bulach, 2013-11-12 15:44:25]

Committed patchset #2 manually as r234526 (presubmit successful).