Renamed packaged_app to legacy_packaged_app in extension feature files. It's

Renamed packaged_app to legacy_packaged_app in extension feature files. It's
confusing otherwise since the C++ enum is called LEGACY_PACKAGED_APP.

Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=220498

[not at google - send to devlin, 2013-08-29 20:43:58]

One of many pet peeves.

[asargent_no_longer_on_chrome, 2013-08-29 22:06:03]

looks like you have a couple of legitimate test failures to fix, e.g.

http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/builders/linux_aura/builds/72989

I glanced at a few of the failures and it looks like in those cases the current
patches somehow end up making chrome think some platform apps are legacy
packaged apps.

[not at google - send to devlin, 2013-08-29 23:04:28]

fixed

[asargent_no_longer_on_chrome, 2013-08-29 23:45:58]

lgtm!

https://codereview.chromium.org/23691012/diff/1/chrome/common/extensions/feat...
File chrome/common/extensions/features/simple_feature.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23691012/diff/1/chrome/common/extensions/feat...
chrome/common/extensions/features/simple_feature.cc:166: return "legacy packaged
app";
wow, this was totally wrong before, huh?

[not at google - send to devlin, 2013-08-29 23:48:12]

https://codereview.chromium.org/23691012/diff/1/chrome/common/extensions/feat...
File chrome/common/extensions/features/simple_feature.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23691012/diff/1/chrome/common/extensions/feat...
chrome/common/extensions/features/simple_feature.cc:166: return "legacy packaged
app";
On 2013/08/29 23:45:59, Antony Sargent wrote:
> wow, this was totally wrong before, huh?

search-replace fail on my part :)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-08-29 23:48:55]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/kalman@chromium.org/23691012/25001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-08-30 03:37:31]

Change committed as 220498