Animated PNG implementation

Animated PNG implementation

BUG=1171
BUG=437662

[MaxStepin, 2016-01-07 16:11:30]

Description was changed from

==========
Animated PNG implementation

Fixed incorrect decoding of ICO files containing PNG data.

BUG=1171
BUG=437662
==========

to

==========
Animated PNG implementation

Fixed incorrect decoding of ICO files containing PNG data.

BUG=1171
BUG=437662
==========

[MaxStepin, 2016-01-07 16:11:30]

maxstepin@gmail.com changed reviewers:
+ noel@chromium.org

[MaxStepin, 2016-01-07 16:13:42]

Description was changed from

==========
Animated PNG implementation

Fixed incorrect decoding of ICO files containing PNG data.

BUG=1171
BUG=437662
==========

to

==========
Animated PNG implementation

Fixed incorrect decoding of ICO files containing PNG data.

BUG=1171
BUG=437662

Closing previous https://codereview.chromium.org/1312843006/
==========

[MaxStepin, 2016-03-26 22:23:35]

Description was changed from

==========
Animated PNG implementation

Fixed incorrect decoding of ICO files containing PNG data.

BUG=1171
BUG=437662

Closing previous https://codereview.chromium.org/1312843006/
==========

to

==========
Animated PNG implementation

BUG=1171
BUG=437662
==========

[acterhd, 2016-07-08 08:56:51]

Somebody review this patch.

[Noel Gordon, 2016-12-01 04:20:02]

@Max.  I've been OOO and noted that chrome has updated to 1.6.X libpng while I
was away.   Not sure how that affects the status of your patch.   In fact, what
is the status of this patch?

[MaxStepin, 2016-12-01 08:58:33]

On 2016/12/01 04:20:02, noel gordon wrote:
> @Max.  I've been OOO and noted that chrome has updated to 1.6.X libpng while I
> was away.   Not sure how that affects the status of your patch.   In fact,
what
> is the status of this patch?

I don't know what OOO means, but OK.
libpng version doesn't matter.
My patch is still fine, but recently I learned that there is another patch in
the works:
https://codereview.chromium.org/2386453003/

[Noel Gordon, 2016-12-01 10:09:44]

On 2016/12/01 08:58:33, MaxStepin wrote:

> I don't know what OOO means, but OK.

OOO === out of the office,  I was away from work on sabbatical for many months.

> libpng version doesn't matter.

OK good.

> My patch is still fine, but recently I learned that there is another patch in
> the works:
> https://codereview.chromium.org/2386453003/

IC.

[Noel Gordon, 2017-02-23 06:10:51]

noel@chromium.org changed reviewers:
- noel@chromium.org