Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(28)

Issue 11817028: Random fixes discovered when looking through CL 11824035. (Closed)

Created:
7 years, 11 months ago by floitsch
Modified:
7 years, 9 months ago
Reviewers:
ahe
CC:
reviews_dartlang.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Random fixes discovered when looking through CL 11824035. Committed: https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=16878

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : More fixes. #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+2 lines, -3 lines) Patch
M sdk/lib/_internal/compiler/implementation/compiler.dart View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download
M tests/compiler/dart2js/pretty_parameter_test.dart View 1 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 2 comments Download
M tests/language/double_to_string_as_exponential2_test.dart View 1 1 chunk +0 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
floitsch
7 years, 11 months ago (2013-01-09 20:06:31 UTC) #1
ahe
LGTM, awesome! https://codereview.chromium.org/11817028/diff/2001/tests/compiler/dart2js/pretty_parameter_test.dart File tests/compiler/dart2js/pretty_parameter_test.dart (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/11817028/diff/2001/tests/compiler/dart2js/pretty_parameter_test.dart#newcode104 tests/compiler/dart2js/pretty_parameter_test.dart:104: Expect.isFalse(matches.moveNext()); Why didn't this turn into a ...
7 years, 11 months ago (2013-01-09 20:09:39 UTC) #2
floitsch
7 years, 9 months ago (2013-03-04 15:26:27 UTC) #3
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Forgot to submit comment.

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/11817028/diff/2001/tests/compiler/dart...
File tests/compiler/dart2js/pretty_parameter_test.dart (right):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/11817028/diff/2001/tests/compiler/dart...
tests/compiler/dart2js/pretty_parameter_test.dart:104:
Expect.isFalse(matches.moveNext());
On 2013/01/09 20:09:39, ahe wrote:
> Why didn't this turn into a test failure?

Because the test was already marked as failing.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698