Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1430)

Unified Diff: sandbox/linux/services/broker_process_unittest.cc

Issue 11557025: Linux sandbox: add a new low-level broker process mechanism. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Add copyright notice Created 8 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « sandbox/linux/services/broker_process.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: sandbox/linux/services/broker_process_unittest.cc
diff --git a/sandbox/linux/services/broker_process_unittest.cc b/sandbox/linux/services/broker_process_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..879fe6660c755a6692d6ef88d55d72b508011c67
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sandbox/linux/services/broker_process_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "sandbox/linux/services/broker_process.h"
+
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <sys/stat.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <sys/wait.h>
+#include <string>
+#include <vector>
+
+#include "base/logging.h"
+#include "sandbox/linux/tests/unit_tests.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace sandbox {
+
+TEST(BrokerProcess, CreateAndDestroy) {
+ std::vector<std::string> read_whitelist;
+ read_whitelist.push_back("/proc/cpuinfo");
+
+ BrokerProcess* open_broker = new BrokerProcess(read_whitelist,
+ std::vector<std::string>());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(open_broker->Init(NULL));
+ pid_t broker_pid = open_broker->broker_pid();
+ delete(open_broker);
+
+ // Now we check that the broker has exited properly.
+ int status = 0;
+ EXPECT_EQ(waitpid(broker_pid, &status, 0), broker_pid);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(WIFEXITED(status));
+ EXPECT_EQ(WEXITSTATUS(status), 0);
+}
+
+TEST(BrokerProcess, TestOpenNull) {
+ const std::vector<std::string> empty;
+ BrokerProcess open_broker(empty, empty);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(open_broker.Init(NULL));
+
+ int fd = open_broker.Open(NULL, O_RDONLY);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -EFAULT);
+}
+
+void TestOpenFilePerms(bool fast_check_in_client) {
+ const char kR_WhiteListed[] = "/proc/DOESNOTEXIST1";
+ const char kW_WhiteListed[] = "/proc/DOESNOTEXIST2";
+ const char kRW_WhiteListed[] = "/proc/DOESNOTEXIST3";
+ const char k_NotWhitelisted[] = "/proc/DOESNOTEXIST4";
+
+ std::vector<std::string> read_whitelist;
+ read_whitelist.push_back(kR_WhiteListed);
+ read_whitelist.push_back(kRW_WhiteListed);
+
+ std::vector<std::string> write_whitelist;
+ write_whitelist.push_back(kW_WhiteListed);
+ write_whitelist.push_back(kRW_WhiteListed);
+
+ BrokerProcess open_broker(read_whitelist,
+ write_whitelist,
+ fast_check_in_client);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(open_broker.Init(NULL));
+
+ int fd = -1;
+ fd = open_broker.Open(kR_WhiteListed, O_RDONLY);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -ENOENT);
+ fd = open_broker.Open(kR_WhiteListed, O_WRONLY);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -EPERM);
+ fd = open_broker.Open(kR_WhiteListed, O_RDWR);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -EPERM);
+
+ fd = open_broker.Open(kW_WhiteListed, O_RDONLY);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -EPERM);
+ fd = open_broker.Open(kW_WhiteListed, O_WRONLY);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -ENOENT);
+ fd = open_broker.Open(kW_WhiteListed, O_RDWR);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -EPERM);
+
+ fd = open_broker.Open(kRW_WhiteListed, O_RDONLY);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -ENOENT);
+ fd = open_broker.Open(kRW_WhiteListed, O_WRONLY);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -ENOENT);
+ fd = open_broker.Open(kRW_WhiteListed, O_RDWR);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -ENOENT);
+
+ fd = open_broker.Open(k_NotWhitelisted, O_RDONLY);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -EPERM);
+ fd = open_broker.Open(k_NotWhitelisted, O_WRONLY);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -EPERM);
+ fd = open_broker.Open(k_NotWhitelisted, O_RDWR);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -EPERM);
+
+ // We have some extra sanity check for clearly wrong values.
+ fd = open_broker.Open(kRW_WhiteListed, O_RDONLY|O_WRONLY|O_RDWR);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -EPERM);
+}
+
+// Run the same thing twice. The second time, we make sure that no security
+// check is performed on the client.
+TEST(BrokerProcess, OpenFilePermsWithClientCheck) {
+ TestOpenFilePerms(true /* fast_check_in_client */);
+}
+
+TEST(BrokerProcess, OpenOpenFilePermsNoClientCheck) {
+ TestOpenFilePerms(false /* fast_check_in_client */);
+}
+
+
+void TestOpenCpuinfo(bool fast_check_in_client) {
+ const char kFileCpuInfo[] = "/proc/cpuinfo";
+ std::vector<std::string> read_whitelist;
+ read_whitelist.push_back(kFileCpuInfo);
+
+ BrokerProcess* open_broker = new BrokerProcess(read_whitelist,
+ std::vector<std::string>(),
+ fast_check_in_client);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(open_broker->Init(NULL));
+ pid_t broker_pid = open_broker->broker_pid();
+
+ int fd = -1;
+ fd = open_broker->Open(kFileCpuInfo, O_RDWR);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, -EPERM);
+
+ // Open cpuinfo via the broker.
+ int cpuinfo_fd = open_broker->Open(kFileCpuInfo, O_RDONLY);
+ ASSERT_GE(cpuinfo_fd, 0);
+ char buf[3];
+ memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
+ int read_len1 = read(cpuinfo_fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
+ EXPECT_GT(read_len1, 0);
+
+ // Open cpuinfo directly.
+ int cpuinfo_fd2 = open(kFileCpuInfo, O_RDONLY);
+ ASSERT_GE(cpuinfo_fd2, 0);
+ char buf2[3];
+ memset(buf2, 1, sizeof(buf2));
+ int read_len2 = read(cpuinfo_fd2, buf2, sizeof(buf2));
+ EXPECT_GT(read_len1, 0);
+
+ // The following is not guaranteed true, but will be in practice.
+ EXPECT_EQ(read_len1, read_len2);
+ // Compare the cpuinfo as returned by the broker with the one we opened
+ // ourselves.
+ EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(buf, buf2, read_len1), 0);
+
+ if (fd >= 0)
+ close(fd);
+ if (cpuinfo_fd >= 0)
+ close(cpuinfo_fd);
+ if (cpuinfo_fd2 >= 0)
+ close(cpuinfo_fd);
+
+ delete(open_broker);
+
+ // Now we check that the broker has exited properly.
+ int status = 0;
+ EXPECT_EQ(waitpid(broker_pid, &status, 0), broker_pid);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(WIFEXITED(status));
+ EXPECT_EQ(WEXITSTATUS(status), 0);
+}
+
+// Run the same thing twice. The second time, we make sure that no security
+// check is performed on the client.
+TEST(BrokerProcess, OpenCpuinfoWithClientCheck) {
+ TestOpenCpuinfo(true /* fast_check_in_client */);
+}
+
+TEST(BrokerProcess, OpenCpuinfoNoClientCheck) {
+ TestOpenCpuinfo(false /* fast_check_in_client */);
+}
+
+TEST(BrokerProcess, OpenFileRW) {
+ char templatename[] = "BrokerProcessXXXXXX";
+ int tempfile = mkstemp(templatename);
+ ASSERT_GE(tempfile, 0);
+ char tempfile_name[2048];
+ int written = snprintf(tempfile_name, sizeof(tempfile_name),
+ "/proc/self/fd/%d", tempfile);
+ ASSERT_LT(written, static_cast<int>(sizeof(tempfile_name)));
+
+ std::vector<std::string> whitelist;
+ whitelist.push_back(tempfile_name);
+
+ BrokerProcess open_broker(whitelist, whitelist);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(open_broker.Init(NULL));
+
+ int tempfile2 = -1;
+ tempfile2 = open_broker.Open(tempfile_name, O_RDWR);
+ ASSERT_GE(tempfile2, 0);
+
+ // Write to the descriptor opened by the broker.
+ char test_text[] = "TESTTESTTEST";
+ ssize_t len = write(tempfile2, test_text, sizeof(test_text));
+ ASSERT_EQ(len, static_cast<ssize_t>(sizeof(test_text)));
+
+ // Read back from the original file descriptor what we wrote through
+ // the descriptor provided by the broker.
+ char buf[1024];
+ len = read(tempfile, buf, sizeof(buf));
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(len, static_cast<ssize_t>(sizeof(test_text)));
+ ASSERT_EQ(memcmp(test_text, buf, sizeof(test_text)), 0);
+
+ // Cleanup the temporary file.
+ char tempfile_full_path[2048];
+ // Make sure tempfile_full_path will terminate with a 0.
+ memset(tempfile_full_path, 0, sizeof(tempfile_full_path));
+ ssize_t ret = readlink(tempfile_name, tempfile_full_path,
+ sizeof(tempfile_full_path));
+ ASSERT_GT(ret, 0);
+ // Make sure we still have a trailing zero in tempfile_full_path.
+ ASSERT_LT(ret, static_cast<ssize_t>(sizeof(tempfile_full_path)));
+ ASSERT_EQ(unlink(tempfile_full_path), 0);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(close(tempfile), 0);
+ EXPECT_EQ(close(tempfile2), 0);
+}
+
+// Sandbox test because we could get a SIGPIPE.
+SANDBOX_TEST(BrokerProcess, BrokerDied) {
+ std::vector<std::string> read_whitelist;
+ read_whitelist.push_back("/proc/cpuinfo");
+
+ BrokerProcess open_broker(read_whitelist,
+ std::vector<std::string>(),
+ true /* fast_check_in_client */,
+ true /* quiet_failures_for_tests */);
+ SANDBOX_ASSERT(open_broker.Init(NULL));
+ pid_t broker_pid = open_broker.broker_pid();
+ SANDBOX_ASSERT(kill(broker_pid, SIGKILL) == 0);
+
+ // Now we check that the broker has exited properly.
+ int status = 0;
+ SANDBOX_ASSERT(waitpid(broker_pid, &status, 0) == broker_pid);
+ SANDBOX_ASSERT(WIFSIGNALED(status));
+ SANDBOX_ASSERT(WTERMSIG(status) == SIGKILL);
+ // Hopefully doing Open with a dead broker won't SIGPIPE us.
+ SANDBOX_ASSERT(open_broker.Open("/proc/cpuinfo", O_RDONLY) == -ENOMEM);
+}
+
+void TestComplexFlags(bool fast_check_in_client) {
+ std::vector<std::string> whitelist;
+ whitelist.push_back("/proc/cpuinfo");
+
+ BrokerProcess open_broker(whitelist,
+ whitelist,
+ fast_check_in_client);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(open_broker.Init(NULL));
+ // Test that we do the right thing for O_CLOEXEC and O_NONBLOCK.
+ // Presently, the right thing is to always deny them since they are not
+ // supported.
+ int fd = -1;
+ fd = open_broker.Open("/proc/cpuinfo", O_RDONLY);
+ ASSERT_GE(fd, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(close(fd), 0);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(open_broker.Open("/proc/cpuinfo", O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC), -EPERM);
+ ASSERT_EQ(open_broker.Open("/proc/cpuinfo", O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK), -EPERM);
+}
+
+TEST(BrokerProcess, ComplexFlagsWithClientCheck) {
+ TestComplexFlags(true /* fast_check_in_client */);
+}
+
+TEST(BrokerProcess, ComplexFlagsNoClientCheck) {
+ TestComplexFlags(false /* fast_check_in_client */);
+}
+
+} // namespace sandbox
« no previous file with comments | « sandbox/linux/services/broker_process.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698