Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1074)

Unified Diff: src/trusted/validator_arm/actual_classes.cc

Issue 10879090: ARM validator: continue with extra_load_store_instructions. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/native_client/trunk/src/native_client
Patch Set: Update with more tables. Created 8 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: src/trusted/validator_arm/actual_classes.cc
diff --git a/src/trusted/validator_arm/actual_classes.cc b/src/trusted/validator_arm/actual_classes.cc
index 2edcdf119b40d25c60dfea0c50c72bfc07c268e6..a97ed440c57c767a2bdd36514f12a6059e21d304 100644
--- a/src/trusted/validator_arm/actual_classes.cc
+++ b/src/trusted/validator_arm/actual_classes.cc
@@ -341,6 +341,10 @@ SafetyLevel LoadBasedOffsetMemoryDouble::safety(const Instruction i) const {
return UNPREDICTABLE;
}
+ if (m.reg(i).Equals(t.reg(i)) || m.reg(i).Equals(t2.reg(i))) {
+ return UNPREDICTABLE;
+ }
+
// Now apply non-double width restrictions for this instruction.
return LoadBasedOffsetMemory::safety(i);
}
@@ -394,6 +398,7 @@ SafetyLevel StoreBasedMemoryWithWriteBack::safety(const Instruction i) const {
// may not check for this. For the moment, we are changing
// the code to ignore this case for stores.
// TODO(karl): Should we not allow this?
+ // TODO(jfb) Fix this.
return UNPREDICTABLE;
}
@@ -428,6 +433,7 @@ SafetyLevel StoreBasedOffsetMemory::safety(const Instruction i) const {
// may not check for this. For the moment, we are changing
// the code to ignore this case for stores.
// TODO(karl): Should we not allow this?
+ // TODO(jfb) FIx this.
return UNPREDICTABLE;
}
@@ -513,6 +519,12 @@ RegisterList Roadblock::defs(Instruction i) const {
}
// Breakpoint
+SafetyLevel Breakpoint::safety(Instruction i) const {
+ return i.GetCondition() == Instruction::AL
+ ? MAY_BE_SAFE
+ : UNPREDICTABLE;
+}
+
bool Breakpoint::is_literal_pool_head(const Instruction i) const {
return i.GetCondition() == Instruction::AL
&& i.Bits(19, 8) == 0x777
@@ -707,6 +719,13 @@ RegisterList MoveDoubleFromCoprocessor::defs(Instruction i) const {
// Control flow
SafetyLevel BxBlx::safety(Instruction i) const {
+ // Extra NaCl constraint: can't branch to PC. This would branch to 8 bytes
+ // after the current instruction. This instruction should be in an instruction
+ // pair, the mask should therefore be to PC and fail checking, but there's
+ // little harm in checking.
+ if (m.reg(i).Equals(kRegisterPc)) return FORBIDDEN_OPERANDS;
+
+ // Redundant with the above, but this is actually UNPREDICTABLE. Expect DCE.
if (link_register.IsUpdated(i) && m.reg(i).Equals(kRegisterPc)) {
return UNPREDICTABLE;
}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698