Refactored ErrorCode into it's own class

sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_unittest.cc

Index: sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_unittest.cc
diff --git a/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_unittest.cc b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_unittest.cc
index 54fe7a7bff7bec3748b7a3a4c54eddb007724f07..bf26b11de646486f99c4f2fa96f2e52e39cc0270 100644
--- a/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_unittest.cc
+++ b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_unittest.cc
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ void StartSandboxOrDie(Sandbox::EvaluateSyscall evaluator) {
 
 void RunInSandbox(Sandbox::EvaluateSyscall evaluator,
                       void (*SandboxedCode)()) {
-  // TODO(markus): Implement IsEqual for ErrorCode
-  // IsEqual(evaluator(__NR_exit_group), Sandbox::SB_ALLOWED) <<
+  // TODO(jln): Implement IsEqual for ErrorCode
+  // IsEqual(evaluator(__NR_exit_group), ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED) <<
   //    "You need to always allow exit_group() in your test policy";
   StartSandboxOrDie(evaluator);
   // TODO(jln): find a way to use the testing framework inside
@@ -110,17 +110,17 @@ void TryPolicyInProcess(Sandbox::EvaluateSyscall evaluator,
 
 // A simple blacklist test
 
-Sandbox::ErrorCode BlacklistNanosleepPolicy(int sysno) {
+ErrorCode BlacklistNanosleepPolicy(int sysno) {
   if (sysno < static_cast<int>(MIN_SYSCALL) ||
       sysno > static_cast<int>(MAX_SYSCALL)) {
     // FIXME: we should really not have to do that in a trivial policy
-    return ENOSYS;
+    return ErrorCode(ENOSYS);
   }
   switch (sysno) {
     case __NR_nanosleep:
-      return EACCES;
+      return ErrorCode(EACCES);
     default:
-      return Sandbox::SB_ALLOWED;
+      return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
   }
 }
 
@@ -139,13 +139,13 @@ TEST(SandboxBpf, ApplyBasicBlacklistPolicy) {
 
 // Now do a simple whitelist test
 
-Sandbox::ErrorCode WhitelistGetpidPolicy(int sysno) {
+ErrorCode WhitelistGetpidPolicy(int sysno) {
   switch (sysno) {
     case __NR_getpid:
     case __NR_exit_group:
-      return Sandbox::SB_ALLOWED;
+      return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
     default:
-      return ENOMEM;
+      return ErrorCode(ENOMEM);
   }
 }
 
@@ -179,18 +179,18 @@ intptr_t EnomemHandler(const struct arch_seccomp_data& args, void *aux) {
   return -ENOMEM;
 }
 
-Sandbox::ErrorCode BlacklistNanosleepPolicySigsys(int sysno) {
+ErrorCode BlacklistNanosleepPolicySigsys(int sysno) {
   if (sysno < static_cast<int>(MIN_SYSCALL) ||
       sysno > static_cast<int>(MAX_SYSCALL)) {
     // FIXME: we should really not have to do that in a trivial policy
-    return ENOSYS;
+    return ErrorCode(ENOSYS);
   }
   switch (sysno) {
     case __NR_nanosleep:
-      return Sandbox::ErrorCode(EnomemHandler,
+      return Sandbox::Trap(EnomemHandler,
                  static_cast<void *>(&BlacklistNanosleepPolicySigsysAuxData));
     default:
-      return Sandbox::SB_ALLOWED;
+      return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
   }
 }
 
@@ -231,11 +231,11 @@ int SysnoToRandomErrno(int sysno) {
   return ((sysno & ~3) >> 2) % 29 + 1;
 }
 
-Sandbox::ErrorCode SyntheticPolicy(int sysno) {
+ErrorCode SyntheticPolicy(int sysno) {
   if (sysno < static_cast<int>(MIN_SYSCALL) ||
       sysno > static_cast<int>(MAX_SYSCALL)) {
     // FIXME: we should really not have to do that in a trivial policy.
-    return ENOSYS;
+    return ErrorCode(ENOSYS);
   }
 
   // TODO(jorgelo): remove this restriction once crbug.com/141694 is fixed.
@@ -246,9 +246,9 @@ Sandbox::ErrorCode SyntheticPolicy(int sysno) {
 
   if (sysno == __NR_exit_group) {
     // exit_group() is special, we really need it to work.
-    return Sandbox::SB_ALLOWED;
+    return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
   } else {
-    return SysnoToRandomErrno(sysno);
+    return ErrorCode(SysnoToRandomErrno(sysno));
   }
 }