| Index: sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.cc
|
| diff --git a/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.cc b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.cc
|
| index dd6ad94457076bf22c1a02db2d8d2c669e070b8e..42eb0f733bc0f7a9e748aa388998c1f8e6760a83 100644
|
| --- a/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.cc
|
| +++ b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.cc
|
| @@ -14,17 +14,17 @@ namespace playground2 {
|
|
|
| // We define a really simple sandbox policy. It is just good enough for us
|
| // to tell that the sandbox has actually been activated.
|
| -Sandbox::ErrorCode Sandbox::probeEvaluator(int signo) {
|
| +ErrorCode Sandbox::probeEvaluator(int signo) {
|
| switch (signo) {
|
| case __NR_getpid:
|
| // Return EPERM so that we can check that the filter actually ran.
|
| - return EPERM;
|
| + return ErrorCode(EPERM);
|
| case __NR_exit_group:
|
| // Allow exit() with a non-default return code.
|
| - return SB_ALLOWED;
|
| + return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
|
| default:
|
| // Make everything else fail in an easily recognizable way.
|
| - return EINVAL;
|
| + return ErrorCode(EINVAL);
|
| }
|
| }
|
|
|
| @@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ void Sandbox::probeProcess(void) {
|
| }
|
| }
|
|
|
| -Sandbox::ErrorCode Sandbox::allowAllEvaluator(int signo) {
|
| +ErrorCode Sandbox::allowAllEvaluator(int signo) {
|
| if (signo < static_cast<int>(MIN_SYSCALL) ||
|
| signo > static_cast<int>(MAX_SYSCALL)) {
|
| - return ENOSYS;
|
| + return ErrorCode(ENOSYS);
|
| }
|
| - return Sandbox::SB_ALLOWED;
|
| + return ErrorCode(ErrorCode::ERR_ALLOWED);
|
| }
|
|
|
| void Sandbox::tryVsyscallProcess(void) {
|
| @@ -60,11 +60,11 @@ bool Sandbox::RunFunctionInPolicy(void (*CodeInSandbox)(),
|
| sigset_t oldMask, newMask;
|
| if (sigfillset(&newMask) ||
|
| sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &newMask, &oldMask)) {
|
| - die("sigprocmask() failed");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("sigprocmask() failed");
|
| }
|
| int fds[2];
|
| if (pipe2(fds, O_NONBLOCK|O_CLOEXEC)) {
|
| - die("pipe() failed");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("pipe() failed");
|
| }
|
|
|
| pid_t pid = fork();
|
| @@ -76,14 +76,14 @@ bool Sandbox::RunFunctionInPolicy(void (*CodeInSandbox)(),
|
| // attacker might cause fork() to fail at will and could trick us
|
| // into running without a sandbox.
|
| sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &oldMask, NULL); // OK, if it fails
|
| - die("fork() failed unexpectedly");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("fork() failed unexpectedly");
|
| }
|
|
|
| // In the child process
|
| if (!pid) {
|
| // Test a very simple sandbox policy to verify that we can
|
| // successfully turn on sandboxing.
|
| - dryRun_ = true;
|
| + Die custom_handler(Die::LogToStderr);
|
| if (HANDLE_EINTR(close(fds[0])) ||
|
| dup2(fds[1], 2) != 2 ||
|
| HANDLE_EINTR(close(fds[1]))) {
|
| @@ -97,19 +97,19 @@ bool Sandbox::RunFunctionInPolicy(void (*CodeInSandbox)(),
|
| // Run our code in the sandbox
|
| CodeInSandbox();
|
| }
|
| - die(NULL);
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE(NULL);
|
| }
|
|
|
| // In the parent process.
|
| if (HANDLE_EINTR(close(fds[1]))) {
|
| - die("close() failed");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("close() failed");
|
| }
|
| if (sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &oldMask, NULL)) {
|
| - die("sigprocmask() failed");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("sigprocmask() failed");
|
| }
|
| int status;
|
| if (HANDLE_EINTR(waitpid(pid, &status, 0)) != pid) {
|
| - die("waitpid() failed unexpectedly");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("waitpid() failed unexpectedly");
|
| }
|
| bool rc = WIFEXITED(status) && WEXITSTATUS(status) == 100;
|
|
|
| @@ -126,11 +126,11 @@ bool Sandbox::RunFunctionInPolicy(void (*CodeInSandbox)(),
|
| --len;
|
| }
|
| buf[len] = '\000';
|
| - die(buf);
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE(buf);
|
| }
|
| }
|
| if (HANDLE_EINTR(close(fds[0]))) {
|
| - die("close() failed");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("close() failed");
|
| }
|
|
|
| return rc;
|
| @@ -138,6 +138,15 @@ bool Sandbox::RunFunctionInPolicy(void (*CodeInSandbox)(),
|
| }
|
|
|
| bool Sandbox::kernelSupportSeccompBPF(int proc_fd) {
|
| +#if defined(SECCOMP_BPF_VALGRIND_HACKS)
|
| + if (RUNNING_ON_VALGRIND) {
|
| + // Valgrind doesn't like our run-time test. Disable testing and assume we
|
| + // always support sandboxing. This feature should only ever be enabled when
|
| + // debugging.
|
| + return true;
|
| + }
|
| +#endif
|
| +
|
| return RunFunctionInPolicy(probeProcess, Sandbox::probeEvaluator, proc_fd) &&
|
| RunFunctionInPolicy(tryVsyscallProcess, Sandbox::allowAllEvaluator,
|
| proc_fd);
|
| @@ -195,10 +204,11 @@ void Sandbox::setProcFd(int proc_fd) {
|
|
|
| void Sandbox::startSandbox() {
|
| if (status_ == STATUS_UNSUPPORTED || status_ == STATUS_UNAVAILABLE) {
|
| - die("Trying to start sandbox, even though it is known to be unavailable");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Trying to start sandbox, even though it is known to be "
|
| + "unavailable");
|
| } else if (status_ == STATUS_ENABLED) {
|
| - die("Cannot start sandbox recursively. Use multiple calls to "
|
| - "setSandboxPolicy() to stack policies instead");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Cannot start sandbox recursively. Use multiple calls to "
|
| + "setSandboxPolicy() to stack policies instead");
|
| }
|
| if (proc_fd_ < 0) {
|
| proc_fd_ = open("/proc", O_RDONLY|O_DIRECTORY);
|
| @@ -208,7 +218,7 @@ void Sandbox::startSandbox() {
|
| // In the future, we might want to tighten this requirement.
|
| }
|
| if (!isSingleThreaded(proc_fd_)) {
|
| - die("Cannot start sandbox, if process is already multi-threaded");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Cannot start sandbox, if process is already multi-threaded");
|
| }
|
|
|
| // We no longer need access to any files in /proc. We want to do this
|
| @@ -216,7 +226,7 @@ void Sandbox::startSandbox() {
|
| // close().
|
| if (proc_fd_ >= 0) {
|
| if (HANDLE_EINTR(close(proc_fd_))) {
|
| - die("Failed to close file descriptor for /proc");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Failed to close file descriptor for /proc");
|
| }
|
| proc_fd_ = -1;
|
| }
|
| @@ -249,10 +259,10 @@ bool Sandbox::isSingleThreaded(int proc_fd) {
|
| return true;
|
| }
|
|
|
| -static bool isDenied(const Sandbox::ErrorCode& code) {
|
| - return (code & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION) == SECCOMP_RET_TRAP ||
|
| - (code >= (SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO + 1) &&
|
| - code <= (SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO + 4095));
|
| +bool Sandbox::isDenied(const ErrorCode& code) {
|
| + return (code.err() & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION) == SECCOMP_RET_TRAP ||
|
| + (code.err() >= (SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO + ErrorCode::ERR_MIN_ERRNO) &&
|
| + code.err() <= (SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO + ErrorCode::ERR_MAX_ERRNO));
|
| }
|
|
|
| void Sandbox::policySanityChecks(EvaluateSyscall syscallEvaluator,
|
| @@ -262,7 +272,7 @@ void Sandbox::policySanityChecks(EvaluateSyscall syscallEvaluator,
|
| // We also have similar checks later, when we actually compile the BPF
|
| // program. That catches problems with incorrectly stacked evaluators.
|
| if (!isDenied(syscallEvaluator(-1))) {
|
| - die("Negative system calls should always be disallowed by policy");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Negative system calls should always be disallowed by policy");
|
| }
|
| #ifndef NDEBUG
|
| #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
|
| @@ -271,7 +281,8 @@ void Sandbox::policySanityChecks(EvaluateSyscall syscallEvaluator,
|
| sysnum <= (MAX_SYSCALL & ~0x40000000u);
|
| ++sysnum) {
|
| if (!isDenied(syscallEvaluator(sysnum))) {
|
| - die("In x32 mode, you should not allow any non-x32 system calls");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("In x32 mode, you should not allow any non-x32 "
|
| + "system calls");
|
| }
|
| }
|
| #else
|
| @@ -279,7 +290,7 @@ void Sandbox::policySanityChecks(EvaluateSyscall syscallEvaluator,
|
| sysnum <= (MAX_SYSCALL | 0x40000000u);
|
| ++sysnum) {
|
| if (!isDenied(syscallEvaluator(sysnum))) {
|
| - die("x32 system calls should be explicitly disallowed");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("x32 system calls should be explicitly disallowed");
|
| }
|
| }
|
| #endif
|
| @@ -293,8 +304,8 @@ void Sandbox::policySanityChecks(EvaluateSyscall syscallEvaluator,
|
| !isDenied(syscallEvaluator(-1)) ||
|
| !isDenied(syscallEvaluator(static_cast<int>(MIN_SYSCALL) - 1)) ||
|
| !isDenied(syscallEvaluator(static_cast<int>(MAX_SYSCALL) + 1))) {
|
| - die("Even for default-allow policies, you must never allow system calls "
|
| - "outside of the standard system call range");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Even for default-allow policies, you must never allow system "
|
| + "calls outside of the standard system call range");
|
| }
|
| return;
|
| }
|
| @@ -302,7 +313,7 @@ void Sandbox::policySanityChecks(EvaluateSyscall syscallEvaluator,
|
| void Sandbox::setSandboxPolicy(EvaluateSyscall syscallEvaluator,
|
| EvaluateArguments argumentEvaluator) {
|
| if (status_ == STATUS_ENABLED) {
|
| - die("Cannot change policy after sandbox has started");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Cannot change policy after sandbox has started");
|
| }
|
| policySanityChecks(syscallEvaluator, argumentEvaluator);
|
| evaluators_.push_back(std::make_pair(syscallEvaluator, argumentEvaluator));
|
| @@ -312,7 +323,7 @@ void Sandbox::installFilter() {
|
| // Verify that the user pushed a policy.
|
| if (evaluators_.empty()) {
|
| filter_failed:
|
| - die("Failed to configure system call filters");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Failed to configure system call filters");
|
| }
|
|
|
| // Set new SIGSYS handler
|
| @@ -335,13 +346,13 @@ void Sandbox::installFilter() {
|
| // We can't handle stacked evaluators, yet. We'll get there eventually
|
| // though. Hang tight.
|
| if (evaluators_.size() != 1) {
|
| - die("Not implemented");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Not implemented");
|
| }
|
|
|
| // Assemble the BPF filter program.
|
| Program *program = new Program();
|
| if (!program) {
|
| - die("Out of memory");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Out of memory");
|
| }
|
|
|
| // If the architecture doesn't match SECCOMP_ARCH, disallow the
|
| @@ -353,8 +364,7 @@ void Sandbox::installFilter() {
|
|
|
| program->push_back((struct sock_filter)
|
| BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K,
|
| - ErrorCode(bpfFailure,
|
| - "Invalid audit architecture in BPF filter")));
|
| + Kill("Invalid audit architecture in BPF filter").err()));
|
|
|
| // Grab the system call number, so that we can implement jump tables.
|
| program->push_back((struct sock_filter)
|
| @@ -373,8 +383,7 @@ void Sandbox::installFilter() {
|
| #endif
|
| program->push_back((struct sock_filter)
|
| BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K,
|
| - ErrorCode(bpfFailure,
|
| - "Illegal mixing of system call ABIs")));
|
| + Kill("Illegal mixing of system call ABIs").err()));
|
| #endif
|
|
|
|
|
| @@ -396,7 +405,7 @@ void Sandbox::installFilter() {
|
| #ifndef NDEBUG
|
| const char *err = NULL;
|
| if (!Verifier::verifyBPF(*program, evaluators_, &err)) {
|
| - die(err);
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE(err);
|
| }
|
| #endif
|
|
|
| @@ -419,13 +428,24 @@ void Sandbox::installFilter() {
|
|
|
| // Release memory that is no longer needed
|
| evaluators_.clear();
|
| + errMap_.clear();
|
|
|
| - // Install BPF filter program
|
| - if (prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0)) {
|
| - die(dryRun_ ? NULL : "Kernel refuses to enable no-new-privs");
|
| - } else {
|
| - if (prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, &prog)) {
|
| - die(dryRun_ ? NULL : "Kernel refuses to turn on BPF filters");
|
| +#if defined(SECCOMP_BPF_VALGRIND_HACKS)
|
| + // Valgrind is really not happy about our sandbox. Disable it when running
|
| + // in Valgrind. This feature is dangerous and should never be enabled by
|
| + // default. We protect it behind a pre-processor option.
|
| + if (!RUNNING_ON_VALGRIND)
|
| +#endif
|
| + {
|
| + // Install BPF filter program
|
| + if (prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0)) {
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE(Die::HasCustomHandler()
|
| + ? NULL : "Kernel refuses to enable no-new-privs");
|
| + } else {
|
| + if (prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, &prog)) {
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE(Die::HasCustomHandler()
|
| + ? NULL : "Kernel refuses to turn on BPF filters");
|
| + }
|
| }
|
| }
|
|
|
| @@ -445,7 +465,7 @@ void Sandbox::findRanges(Ranges *ranges) {
|
| sysnum <= MAX_SYSCALL + 1;
|
| ++sysnum) {
|
| ErrorCode err = evaluateSyscall(static_cast<int>(sysnum));
|
| - if (err != oldErr) {
|
| + if (!err.Equals(oldErr)) {
|
| ranges->push_back(Range(oldSysnum, sysnum-1, oldErr));
|
| oldSysnum = sysnum;
|
| oldErr = err;
|
| @@ -460,10 +480,10 @@ void Sandbox::findRanges(Ranges *ranges) {
|
| // We don't actually iterate over all possible 2^32 values, though. We just
|
| // perform spot checks at the boundaries.
|
| // The cases that we test are: 0x7FFFFFFF, 0x80000000, 0xFFFFFFFF.
|
| - if (oldErr != evaluateSyscall(std::numeric_limits<int>::max()) ||
|
| - oldErr != evaluateSyscall(std::numeric_limits<int>::min()) ||
|
| - oldErr != evaluateSyscall(-1)) {
|
| - die("Invalid seccomp policy");
|
| + if (!oldErr.Equals(evaluateSyscall(std::numeric_limits<int>::max())) ||
|
| + !oldErr.Equals(evaluateSyscall(std::numeric_limits<int>::min())) ||
|
| + !oldErr.Equals(evaluateSyscall(-1))) {
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Invalid seccomp policy");
|
| }
|
| ranges->push_back(
|
| Range(oldSysnum, std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max(), oldErr));
|
| @@ -477,7 +497,7 @@ void Sandbox::emitJumpStatements(Program *program, RetInsns *rets,
|
| // As a sanity check, we need to have at least two distinct ranges for us
|
| // to be able to build a jump table.
|
| if (stop - start <= 1) {
|
| - die("Invalid set of system call ranges");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Invalid set of system call ranges");
|
| }
|
|
|
| // Pick the range object that is located at the mid point of our list.
|
| @@ -488,7 +508,7 @@ void Sandbox::emitJumpStatements(Program *program, RetInsns *rets,
|
| Program::size_type jmp = program->size();
|
| if (jmp >= SECCOMP_MAX_PROGRAM_SIZE) {
|
| compiler_err:
|
| - die("Internal compiler error; failed to compile jump table");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Internal compiler error; failed to compile jump table");
|
| }
|
| program->push_back((struct sock_filter)
|
| BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGE+BPF_K, mid->from,
|
| @@ -506,7 +526,7 @@ void Sandbox::emitJumpStatements(Program *program, RetInsns *rets,
|
| // Since all branches in BPF programs have to be forward branches, we
|
| // keep track of our current instruction pointer and then fix up the
|
| // branch when we emit the BPF_RET statement in emitReturnStatements().
|
| - (*rets)[start->err].push_back(FixUp(jmp, false));
|
| + (*rets)[start->err.err()].push_back(FixUp(jmp, false));
|
| } else {
|
| // Sub-divide the list of ranges and continue recursively.
|
| emitJumpStatements(program, rets, start, mid);
|
| @@ -518,7 +538,7 @@ void Sandbox::emitJumpStatements(Program *program, RetInsns *rets,
|
| // We narrowed things down to a single range object. Remember instruction
|
| // pointer and exit code, so that we can patch up the target of the jump
|
| // instruction in emitReturnStatements().
|
| - (*rets)[mid->err].push_back(FixUp(jmp, true));
|
| + (*rets)[mid->err.err()].push_back(FixUp(jmp, true));
|
| } else {
|
| // We now know where the block of instructions for the "true" comparison
|
| // starts. Patch up the jump target of the BPF_JMP instruction that we
|
| @@ -542,7 +562,7 @@ void Sandbox::emitReturnStatements(Program *program, const RetInsns& rets) {
|
| ++ret_iter) {
|
| Program::size_type ip = program->size();
|
| if (ip >= SECCOMP_MAX_PROGRAM_SIZE) {
|
| - die("Internal compiler error; failed to compile jump table");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Internal compiler error; failed to compile jump table");
|
| }
|
| program->push_back((struct sock_filter)
|
| BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, ret_iter->first));
|
| @@ -555,7 +575,7 @@ void Sandbox::emitReturnStatements(Program *program, const RetInsns& rets) {
|
| // Jumps are always relative and they are always forward.
|
| int distance = ip - insn_iter->addr - 1;
|
| if (distance < 0 || distance > 255) {
|
| - die("Internal compiler error; failed to compile jump table");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Internal compiler error; failed to compile jump table");
|
| }
|
|
|
| // Decide whether we need to patch up the "true" or the "false" jump
|
| @@ -576,15 +596,15 @@ void Sandbox::sigSys(int nr, siginfo_t *info, void *void_context) {
|
| if (nr != SIGSYS || info->si_code != SYS_SECCOMP || !void_context ||
|
| info->si_errno <= 0 ||
|
| static_cast<size_t>(info->si_errno) > trapArraySize_) {
|
| - // die() can call LOG(FATAL). This is not normally async-signal safe
|
| - // and can lead to bugs. We should eventually implement a different
|
| + // SANDBOX_DIE() can call LOG(FATAL). This is not normally async-signal
|
| + // safe and can lead to bugs. We should eventually implement a different
|
| // logging and reporting mechanism that is safe to be called from
|
| // the sigSys() handler.
|
| // TODO: If we feel confident that our code otherwise works correctly, we
|
| // could actually make an argument that spurious SIGSYS should
|
| // just get silently ignored. TBD
|
| sigsys_err:
|
| - die("Unexpected SIGSYS received");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Unexpected SIGSYS received");
|
| }
|
|
|
| // Signal handlers should always preserve "errno". Otherwise, we could
|
| @@ -639,19 +659,16 @@ void Sandbox::sigSys(int nr, siginfo_t *info, void *void_context) {
|
| return;
|
| }
|
|
|
| -intptr_t Sandbox::bpfFailure(const struct arch_seccomp_data&, void *aux) {
|
| - die(static_cast<char *>(aux));
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -int Sandbox::getTrapId(Sandbox::TrapFnc fnc, const void *aux) {
|
| +ErrorCode Sandbox::Trap(ErrorCode::TrapFnc fnc, const void *aux) {
|
| // Each unique pair of TrapFnc and auxiliary data make up a distinct instance
|
| // of a SECCOMP_RET_TRAP.
|
| - std::pair<TrapFnc, const void *> key(fnc, aux);
|
| + std::pair<ErrorCode::TrapFnc, const void *> key(fnc, aux);
|
| TrapIds::const_iterator iter = trapIds_.find(key);
|
| + uint16_t id;
|
| if (iter != trapIds_.end()) {
|
| // We have seen this pair before. Return the same id that we assigned
|
| // earlier.
|
| - return iter->second;
|
| + id = iter->second;
|
| } else {
|
| // This is a new pair. Remember it and assign a new id.
|
| // Please note that we have to store traps in memory that doesn't get
|
| @@ -661,12 +678,12 @@ int Sandbox::getTrapId(Sandbox::TrapFnc fnc, const void *aux) {
|
| if (!traps_) {
|
| traps_ = new Traps();
|
| }
|
| - Traps::size_type id = traps_->size() + 1;
|
| - if (id > SECCOMP_RET_DATA) {
|
| + if (traps_->size() >= SECCOMP_RET_DATA) {
|
| // In practice, this is pretty much impossible to trigger, as there
|
| // are other kernel limitations that restrict overall BPF program sizes.
|
| - die("Too many SECCOMP_RET_TRAP callback instances");
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE("Too many SECCOMP_RET_TRAP callback instances");
|
| }
|
| + id = traps_->size() + 1;
|
|
|
| traps_->push_back(ErrorCode(fnc, aux, id));
|
| trapIds_[key] = id;
|
| @@ -679,17 +696,27 @@ int Sandbox::getTrapId(Sandbox::TrapFnc fnc, const void *aux) {
|
| // signal handler, where we can safely do so.
|
| trapArray_ = &(*traps_)[0];
|
| trapArraySize_ = id;
|
| - return id;
|
| }
|
| +
|
| + ErrorCode err = ErrorCode(fnc, aux, id);
|
| + return errMap_[err.err()] = err;
|
| +}
|
| +
|
| +intptr_t Sandbox::bpfFailure(const struct arch_seccomp_data&, void *aux) {
|
| + SANDBOX_DIE(static_cast<char *>(aux));
|
| +}
|
| +
|
| +ErrorCode Sandbox::Kill(const char *msg) {
|
| + return Trap(bpfFailure, const_cast<char *>(msg));
|
| }
|
|
|
| -bool Sandbox::dryRun_ = false;
|
| Sandbox::SandboxStatus Sandbox::status_ = STATUS_UNKNOWN;
|
| int Sandbox::proc_fd_ = -1;
|
| Sandbox::Evaluators Sandbox::evaluators_;
|
| +Sandbox::ErrMap Sandbox::errMap_;
|
| Sandbox::Traps *Sandbox::traps_ = NULL;
|
| Sandbox::TrapIds Sandbox::trapIds_;
|
| -Sandbox::ErrorCode *Sandbox::trapArray_ = NULL;
|
| +ErrorCode *Sandbox::trapArray_ = NULL;
|
| size_t Sandbox::trapArraySize_ = 0;
|
|
|
| } // namespace
|
|
|