Implement installation of the Chrome App Host.

chrome/installer/util/chromium_binaries_distribution.h

Index: chrome/installer/util/chromium_binaries_distribution.h
diff --git a/chrome/installer/util/chromium_binaries_distribution.h b/chrome/installer/util/chromium_binaries_distribution.h
index 51c26e372f00271051232fe29be5821e22905cb3..dc649f5b88119db113463f3a093b067a2cf793ba 100644
--- a/chrome/installer/util/chromium_binaries_distribution.h
+++ b/chrome/installer/util/chromium_binaries_distribution.h
@@ -46,7 +46,11 @@ class ChromiumBinariesDistribution : public BrowserDistribution {
 
   virtual bool CanSetAsDefault() OVERRIDE;
 
-  virtual int GetIconIndex() OVERRIDE;
+  virtual bool CanCreateDesktopShortcuts() OVERRIDE;
+  virtual bool GetDelegateExecuteHandlerData(string16* handler_class_uuid,

[tommi (sloooow) - chröme, 2012/07/12 08:11:31]

would it make sense to group these into a struct?

[erikwright (departed), 2012/07/16 20:13:11]

Possibly. grt@, when you get back, WDYT?

[grt (UTC plus 2), 2012/07/23 11:31:12]

I think it's fine as-is.  Callers can pass NULL for any subset of the parameters
if they only care about a single value.  Using a struct would be more work for
the callers.  I think the interface UUID is actually constant across all
implementations, so it could be removed from the interface.

+      string16* type_lib_uuid,
+      string16* type_lib_version,
+      string16* interface_uuid) OVERRIDE;
 
   virtual bool GetChromeChannel(string16* channel) OVERRIDE;