Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(482)

Issue 10027027: Moved SuicideOnChannelErrorFilter to content. (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 8 months ago by asharif1
Modified:
8 years, 8 months ago
Reviewers:
nsylvain, jam
CC:
bjanakiraman1, chromium-reviews, joi+watch-content_chromium.org, jam, darin-cc_chromium.org, brettw-cc_chromium.org
Base URL:
http://git.chromium.org/chromium/src.git@master
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Moved SuicideOnChannelErrorFilter to content. BUG=none TEST=trybots Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=131429

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+28 lines, -27 lines) Patch
M chrome/renderer/chrome_render_process_observer.cc View 2 chunks +0 lines, -27 lines 0 comments Download
M content/renderer/render_thread_impl.cc View 2 chunks +28 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 8 (0 generated)
asharif1
jam, PTAL.
8 years, 8 months ago (2012-04-09 19:00:13 UTC) #1
jam
lgtm, thanks
8 years, 8 months ago (2012-04-09 19:08:54 UTC) #2
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/asharif@chromium.org/10027027/1
8 years, 8 months ago (2012-04-09 19:25:22 UTC) #3
commit-bot: I haz the power
Change committed as 131429
8 years, 8 months ago (2012-04-09 20:54:18 UTC) #4
nsylvain
I think this change is causing important problems on the bots. (And I can reproduce ...
8 years, 8 months ago (2012-04-10 00:23:36 UTC) #5
jam
doh, we should revert this then. sorry Ahmad I didn't expect this. i'll sync on ...
8 years, 8 months ago (2012-04-10 00:40:09 UTC) #6
asharif1
Sorry about this. I really think problems like these should be caught by the commit ...
8 years, 8 months ago (2012-04-10 02:48:49 UTC) #7
nsylvain
8 years, 8 months ago (2012-04-10 15:50:12 UTC) #8
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:48 PM, asharif <asharif@chromium.org> wrote:

> Sorry about this.
>
> I really think problems like these should be caught by the commit queue
> and/or trybots. Should I have done something different than git try?
>
> Why does the CQ/trybots fail because of flakiness but not because of real
> problems? I thought the reason we had flaky tests was to extend the
> coverage to catch real issues.
>

The commit queue/try bots does only 1 thing, "run tests and check if they
return 0 or non-zero", and based on that it will determine if the patch is
good or not.   If the test executable returned 0, then it's a pass.  Let's
make sure we don't return 0 on failure otherwise all our buildbot
infrastructure will be useless.

Nicolas


> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:23 PM, <nsylvain@google.com> wrote:
>
>> I think this change is causing important problems on the bots. (And I can
>> reproduce locally)
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> chrome-bot@mini44-m4 bash$ ./content_unittests
>> --gtest_filter=**WebRTCAudioDeviceTest.*
>> Note: Google Test filter = WebRTCAudioDeviceTest.*
>> [==========] Running 7 tests from 1 test case.
>> [----------] Global test environment set-up.
>> [----------] 7 tests from WebRTCAudioDeviceTest
>> [ RUN      ] WebRTCAudioDeviceTest.**TestValidInputRates
>> chrome-bot@mini44-m4 bash$
>>
>>
>> For some reasons this test is making content_unittest crash. The worse
>> thing is
>> that since you exit with 0, it makes content_unittest return 0, which
>> means it's
>> not an error.  This is causing content_unittests to be green on the bot,
>> and yet
>> it does not run to completion.
>>
>> http://codereview.chromium.**org/10027027/
>>
>
>

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698