Issue 10026011: Use ldexp instead of pow for more accuracy

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Issue 10026011: Use ldexp instead of pow for more accuracy (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 8 months ago by Net147

Modified:
8 years, 8 months ago

Reviewers:
ulan, Yang

CC:
v8-dev

Base URL:
http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge/

Visibility:
Public.

More Reviews

Description

Use ldexp instead of pow for more accuracy This fixes failing octal conversion test with MinGW-w64 GCC 4.5.2 due to pow resulting in more error than ldexp when constructing a double from a mantissa, exponent and sign (e.g. when 2 is raised to the power of 98). Contributed by net147@gmail.com BUGS= TEST=cctest/test-conversions/Octal

Patch Set 1 #

Created: 8 years, 8 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

		Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Delta from patch set	Stats (+1 line, -1 line)			Patch
	M	src/conversions-inl.h	View		1 chunk	+1 line, -1 line	0 comments	Download

Messages

Total messages: 1 (0 generated)

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages