Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(253)

Issue 10350003: Step toward eliminating increment nodes, starting with increment local. Fix a bug in evaluating sid… (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 7 months ago by srdjan
Modified:
8 years, 7 months ago
Reviewers:
hausner
CC:
reviews_dartlang.org, vm-dev_dartlang.org, Kevin Millikin (Google)
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Step toward eliminating increment nodes, starting with increment local. Fix a bug in evaluating side effect free nodes. Committed: https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=7300

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 2 : #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+57 lines, -226 lines) Patch
M runtime/vm/ast.h View 1 2 chunks +0 lines, -30 lines 0 comments Download
M runtime/vm/ast.cc View 1 3 chunks +14 lines, -14 lines 0 comments Download
M runtime/vm/ast_printer.cc View 1 1 chunk +0 lines, -5 lines 0 comments Download
M runtime/vm/code_generator_ia32.cc View 1 1 chunk +0 lines, -27 lines 0 comments Download
M runtime/vm/code_generator_x64.cc View 1 1 chunk +0 lines, -27 lines 0 comments Download
M runtime/vm/flow_graph_builder.h View 1 1 chunk +0 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M runtime/vm/flow_graph_builder.cc View 1 1 chunk +0 lines, -48 lines 0 comments Download
M runtime/vm/opt_code_generator_ia32.h View 1 1 chunk +0 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M runtime/vm/opt_code_generator_ia32.cc View 1 1 chunk +0 lines, -56 lines 0 comments Download
M runtime/vm/parser.h View 1 2 chunks +4 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M runtime/vm/parser.cc View 1 14 chunks +39 lines, -17 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
srdjan
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-05-03 00:34:28 UTC) #1
hausner
LGTM. It took me a while to grok the idea. I think it would be ...
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-05-03 17:04:41 UTC) #2
srdjan
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-05-03 20:16:47 UTC) #3
Yes, we should come up with a better name than pseudo input.

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10350003/diff/1/runtime/vm/parser.cc
File runtime/vm/parser.cc (right):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10350003/diff/1/runtime/vm/parser.cc#n...
runtime/vm/parser.cc:5909: new LocalVariable(0,
On 2012/05/03 17:04:41, hausner wrote:
> Just a gut feeling, but I'd prefer the token position of the function rather
> than 0.

Done.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698