Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(950)

Unified Diff: sandbox/src/handle_policy.cc

Issue 9838083: Add a sandbox API for broker handle duplication (Closed) Base URL: svn://chrome-svn/chrome/trunk/src/
Patch Set: Created 8 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: sandbox/src/handle_policy.cc
===================================================================
--- sandbox/src/handle_policy.cc (revision 0)
+++ sandbox/src/handle_policy.cc (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "sandbox/src/handle_policy.h"
+
+#include <string>
+
+#include "base/win/scoped_handle.h"
+#include "sandbox/src/ipc_tags.h"
+#include "sandbox/src/policy_engine_opcodes.h"
+#include "sandbox/src/policy_params.h"
+#include "sandbox/src/sandbox.h"
+#include "sandbox/src/sandbox_factory.h"
+#include "sandbox/src/sandbox_types.h"
+#include "sandbox/src/sandbox_utils.h"
+#include "sandbox/src/win_utils.h"
+
+namespace sandbox {
+
+bool HandlePolicy::GenerateRules(const wchar_t* name,
+ TargetPolicy::Semantics semantics,
rvargas (doing something else) 2012/03/27 00:35:33 nit: indentation
jschuh 2012/03/27 01:36:19 Done.
+ LowLevelPolicy* policy) {
+ // We don't support any other semantics for handles yet.
+ if (TargetPolicy::HANDLES_DUP_ANY != semantics) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ PolicyRule handle(ASK_BROKER);
rvargas (doing something else) 2012/03/27 00:35:33 nit: handle_rule? (or rule)
jschuh 2012/03/27 01:36:19 How about duplicate_rule?
rvargas (doing something else) 2012/03/27 02:30:59 That works
+ if (!handle.AddStringMatch(IF, NameBased::NAME, name, CASE_INSENSITIVE)) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (!policy->AddRule(IPC_DUPLICATEHANDLEPROXY_TAG, &handle)) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
+DWORD HandlePolicy::DuplicateHandleProxyAction(EvalResult eval_result,
+ const ClientInfo& client_info,
+ HANDLE source_handle,
+ DWORD target_process_id,
+ HANDLE* target_handle,
+ DWORD desired_access,
+ BOOL inherit_handle,
+ DWORD options) {
+ // The only action supported is ASK_BROKER which means duplicate the handle.
+ if (ASK_BROKER != eval_result) {
+ return ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED;
+ }
+
+ // Make sure the target is one of our sandboxed children.
+ if (!SandboxFactory::GetBrokerServices()->IsActiveTarget(target_process_id)) {
rvargas (doing something else) 2012/03/27 00:35:33 Calling GetBrokerServices feels weird.
jschuh 2012/03/27 01:36:19 Can't think of a better way. It's the only thing t
rvargas (doing something else) 2012/03/27 02:30:59 What I don't like is going through the external in
+ return ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED;
+ }
+
+ base::win::ScopedHandle target_process(::OpenProcess(PROCESS_DUP_HANDLE,
+ FALSE,
+ target_process_id));
+ if (NULL == target_process)
+ return ::GetLastError();
+
+ DWORD result = ERROR_SUCCESS;
+ if (!::DuplicateHandle(client_info.process, source_handle, target_process,
+ target_handle, desired_access, inherit_handle,
+ options)) {
+ return ::GetLastError();
+ }
+
+ return ERROR_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+} // namespace sandbox
+
Property changes on: sandbox\src\handle_policy.cc
___________________________________________________________________
Added: svn:eol-style
+ LF

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698