| Index: third_party/tcmalloc/vendor/NEWS
|
| ===================================================================
|
| --- third_party/tcmalloc/vendor/NEWS (revision 126727)
|
| +++ third_party/tcmalloc/vendor/NEWS (working copy)
|
| @@ -1,131 +1,5 @@
|
| -== 03 February 2012 ==
|
| +== 15 July 2011 ==
|
|
|
| -I've just released gperftools 2.0
|
| -
|
| -The `google-perftools` project has been renamed to `gperftools`. I
|
| -(csilvers) am stepping down as maintainer, to be replaced by
|
| -David Chappelle. Welcome to the team, David! David has been an
|
| -an active contributor to perftools in the past -- in fact, he's the
|
| -only person other than me that already has commit status. I am
|
| -pleased to have him take over as maintainer.
|
| -
|
| -I have both renamed the project (the Google Code site renamed a few
|
| -weeks ago), and bumped the major version number up to 2, to reflect
|
| -the new community ownership of the project. Almost all the
|
| -[http://gperftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/gperftools-2.0/ChangeLog changes]
|
| -are related to the renaming.
|
| -
|
| -The main functional change from google-perftools 1.10 is that
|
| -I've renamed the `google/` include-directory to be `gperftools/`
|
| -instead. New code should `#include <gperftools/tcmalloc.h>`/etc.
|
| -(Most users of perftools don't need any perftools-specific includes at
|
| -all, so this is mostly directed to "power users.") I've kept the old
|
| -names around as forwarding headers to the new, so `#include
|
| -<google/tcmalloc.h>` will continue to work.
|
| -
|
| -(The other functional change which I snuck in is getting rid of some
|
| -bash-isms in one of the unittest driver scripts, so it could run on
|
| -Solaris.)
|
| -
|
| -Note that some internal names still contain the text `google`, such as
|
| -the `google_malloc` internal linker section. I think that's a
|
| -trickier transition, and can happen in a future release (if at all).
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -=== 31 January 2012 ===
|
| -
|
| -I've just released perftools 1.10
|
| -
|
| -There is an API-incompatible change: several of the methods in the
|
| -`MallocExtension` class have changed from taking a `void*` to taking a
|
| -`const void*`. You should not be affected by this API change
|
| -unless you've written your own custom malloc extension that derives
|
| -from `MallocExtension`, but since it is a user-visible change, I have
|
| -upped the `.so` version number for this release.
|
| -
|
| -This release focuses on improvements to linux-syscall-support.h,
|
| -including ARM and PPC fixups and general cleanups. I hope this will
|
| -magically fix an array of bugs people have been seeing.
|
| -
|
| -There is also exciting news on the porting front, with support for
|
| -patching win64 assembly contributed by IBM Canada! This is an
|
| -important step -- perhaps the most difficult -- to getting perftools
|
| -to work on 64-bit windows using the patching technique (it doesn't
|
| -affect the libc-modification technique). `premable_patcher_test` has
|
| -been added to help test these changes; it is meant to compile under
|
| -x86_64, and won't work under win32.
|
| -
|
| -For the full list of changes, including improved `HEAP_PROFILE_MMAP`
|
| -support, see the
|
| -[http://gperftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/google-perftools-1.10/ChangeLog ChangeLog].
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -=== 24 January 2011 ===
|
| -
|
| -The `google-perftools` Google Code page has been renamed to
|
| -`gperftools`, in preparation for the project being renamed to
|
| -`gperftools`. In the coming weeks, I'll be stepping down as
|
| -maintainer for the perftools project, and as part of that Google is
|
| -relinquishing ownership of the project; it will now be entirely
|
| -community run. The name change reflects that shift. The 'g' in
|
| -'gperftools' stands for 'great'. :-)
|
| -
|
| -=== 23 December 2011 ===
|
| -
|
| -I've just released perftools 1.9.1
|
| -
|
| -I missed including a file in the tarball, that is needed to compile on
|
| -ARM. If you are not compiling on ARM, or have successfully compiled
|
| -perftools 1.9, there is no need to upgrade.
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -=== 22 December 2011 ===
|
| -
|
| -I've just released perftools 1.9
|
| -
|
| -This change has a slew of improvements, from better ARM and freebsd
|
| -support, to improved performance by moving some code outside of locks,
|
| -to better pprof reporting of code with overloaded functions.
|
| -
|
| -The full list of changes is in the
|
| -[http://google-perftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/google-perftools-1.9/ChangeLog ChangeLog].
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -=== 26 August 2011 ===
|
| -
|
| -I've just released perftools 1.8.3
|
| -
|
| -The star-crossed 1.8 series continues; in 1.8.1, I had accidentally
|
| -removed some code that was needed for FreeBSD. (Without this code
|
| -many apps would crash at startup.) This release re-adds that code.
|
| -If you are not on FreeBSD, or are using FreeBSD with perftools 1.8 or
|
| -earlier, there is no need to upgrade.
|
| -
|
| -=== 11 August 2011 ===
|
| -
|
| -I've just released perftools 1.8.2
|
| -
|
| -I was incorrectly calculating the patch-level in the configuration
|
| -step, meaning the TC_VERSION_PATCH #define in tcmalloc.h was wrong.
|
| -Since the testing framework checks for this, it was failing. Now it
|
| -should work again. This time, I was careful to re-run my tests after
|
| -upping the version number. :-)
|
| -
|
| -If you don't care about the TC_VERSION_PATCH #define, there's no
|
| -reason to upgrae.
|
| -
|
| -=== 26 July 2011 ===
|
| -
|
| -I've just released perftools 1.8.1
|
| -
|
| -I was missing an #include that caused the build to break under some
|
| -compilers, especially newer gcc's, that wanted it. This only affects
|
| -people who build from source, so only the .tar.gz file is updated from
|
| -perftools 1.8. If you didn't have any problems compiling perftools
|
| -1.8, there's no reason to upgrade.
|
| -
|
| -=== 15 July 2011 ===
|
| -
|
| I've just released perftools 1.8
|
|
|
| Of the many changes in this release, a good number pertain to porting.
|
| @@ -152,7 +26,7 @@
|
|
|
| There are many other changes as well, too numerous to recount here,
|
| but present in the
|
| -[http://google-perftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/google-perftools-1.8/ChangeLog ChangeLog].
|
| +[http://google-perftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/perftools-1.8/ChangeLog ChangeLog].
|
|
|
|
|
| === 7 February 2011 ===
|
| @@ -179,7 +53,7 @@
|
| reduction in the amount of tcmalloc overhead uder x86_64, improved
|
| performance in the case of contention, and many many bugfixes,
|
| especially architecture-specific bugfixes. See the
|
| -[http://google-perftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/google-perftools-1.7/ChangeLog ChangeLog]
|
| +[http://google-perftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/perftools-1.7/ChangeLog ChangeLog]
|
| for full details.
|
|
|
| One architecture-specific change of note is added comments in the
|
|
|