Index: third_party/tcmalloc/vendor/NEWS |
=================================================================== |
--- third_party/tcmalloc/vendor/NEWS (revision 126727) |
+++ third_party/tcmalloc/vendor/NEWS (working copy) |
@@ -1,131 +1,5 @@ |
-== 03 February 2012 == |
+== 15 July 2011 == |
-I've just released gperftools 2.0 |
- |
-The `google-perftools` project has been renamed to `gperftools`. I |
-(csilvers) am stepping down as maintainer, to be replaced by |
-David Chappelle. Welcome to the team, David! David has been an |
-an active contributor to perftools in the past -- in fact, he's the |
-only person other than me that already has commit status. I am |
-pleased to have him take over as maintainer. |
- |
-I have both renamed the project (the Google Code site renamed a few |
-weeks ago), and bumped the major version number up to 2, to reflect |
-the new community ownership of the project. Almost all the |
-[http://gperftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/gperftools-2.0/ChangeLog changes] |
-are related to the renaming. |
- |
-The main functional change from google-perftools 1.10 is that |
-I've renamed the `google/` include-directory to be `gperftools/` |
-instead. New code should `#include <gperftools/tcmalloc.h>`/etc. |
-(Most users of perftools don't need any perftools-specific includes at |
-all, so this is mostly directed to "power users.") I've kept the old |
-names around as forwarding headers to the new, so `#include |
-<google/tcmalloc.h>` will continue to work. |
- |
-(The other functional change which I snuck in is getting rid of some |
-bash-isms in one of the unittest driver scripts, so it could run on |
-Solaris.) |
- |
-Note that some internal names still contain the text `google`, such as |
-the `google_malloc` internal linker section. I think that's a |
-trickier transition, and can happen in a future release (if at all). |
- |
- |
-=== 31 January 2012 === |
- |
-I've just released perftools 1.10 |
- |
-There is an API-incompatible change: several of the methods in the |
-`MallocExtension` class have changed from taking a `void*` to taking a |
-`const void*`. You should not be affected by this API change |
-unless you've written your own custom malloc extension that derives |
-from `MallocExtension`, but since it is a user-visible change, I have |
-upped the `.so` version number for this release. |
- |
-This release focuses on improvements to linux-syscall-support.h, |
-including ARM and PPC fixups and general cleanups. I hope this will |
-magically fix an array of bugs people have been seeing. |
- |
-There is also exciting news on the porting front, with support for |
-patching win64 assembly contributed by IBM Canada! This is an |
-important step -- perhaps the most difficult -- to getting perftools |
-to work on 64-bit windows using the patching technique (it doesn't |
-affect the libc-modification technique). `premable_patcher_test` has |
-been added to help test these changes; it is meant to compile under |
-x86_64, and won't work under win32. |
- |
-For the full list of changes, including improved `HEAP_PROFILE_MMAP` |
-support, see the |
-[http://gperftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/google-perftools-1.10/ChangeLog ChangeLog]. |
- |
- |
-=== 24 January 2011 === |
- |
-The `google-perftools` Google Code page has been renamed to |
-`gperftools`, in preparation for the project being renamed to |
-`gperftools`. In the coming weeks, I'll be stepping down as |
-maintainer for the perftools project, and as part of that Google is |
-relinquishing ownership of the project; it will now be entirely |
-community run. The name change reflects that shift. The 'g' in |
-'gperftools' stands for 'great'. :-) |
- |
-=== 23 December 2011 === |
- |
-I've just released perftools 1.9.1 |
- |
-I missed including a file in the tarball, that is needed to compile on |
-ARM. If you are not compiling on ARM, or have successfully compiled |
-perftools 1.9, there is no need to upgrade. |
- |
- |
-=== 22 December 2011 === |
- |
-I've just released perftools 1.9 |
- |
-This change has a slew of improvements, from better ARM and freebsd |
-support, to improved performance by moving some code outside of locks, |
-to better pprof reporting of code with overloaded functions. |
- |
-The full list of changes is in the |
-[http://google-perftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/google-perftools-1.9/ChangeLog ChangeLog]. |
- |
- |
-=== 26 August 2011 === |
- |
-I've just released perftools 1.8.3 |
- |
-The star-crossed 1.8 series continues; in 1.8.1, I had accidentally |
-removed some code that was needed for FreeBSD. (Without this code |
-many apps would crash at startup.) This release re-adds that code. |
-If you are not on FreeBSD, or are using FreeBSD with perftools 1.8 or |
-earlier, there is no need to upgrade. |
- |
-=== 11 August 2011 === |
- |
-I've just released perftools 1.8.2 |
- |
-I was incorrectly calculating the patch-level in the configuration |
-step, meaning the TC_VERSION_PATCH #define in tcmalloc.h was wrong. |
-Since the testing framework checks for this, it was failing. Now it |
-should work again. This time, I was careful to re-run my tests after |
-upping the version number. :-) |
- |
-If you don't care about the TC_VERSION_PATCH #define, there's no |
-reason to upgrae. |
- |
-=== 26 July 2011 === |
- |
-I've just released perftools 1.8.1 |
- |
-I was missing an #include that caused the build to break under some |
-compilers, especially newer gcc's, that wanted it. This only affects |
-people who build from source, so only the .tar.gz file is updated from |
-perftools 1.8. If you didn't have any problems compiling perftools |
-1.8, there's no reason to upgrade. |
- |
-=== 15 July 2011 === |
- |
I've just released perftools 1.8 |
Of the many changes in this release, a good number pertain to porting. |
@@ -152,7 +26,7 @@ |
There are many other changes as well, too numerous to recount here, |
but present in the |
-[http://google-perftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/google-perftools-1.8/ChangeLog ChangeLog]. |
+[http://google-perftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/perftools-1.8/ChangeLog ChangeLog]. |
=== 7 February 2011 === |
@@ -179,7 +53,7 @@ |
reduction in the amount of tcmalloc overhead uder x86_64, improved |
performance in the case of contention, and many many bugfixes, |
especially architecture-specific bugfixes. See the |
-[http://google-perftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/google-perftools-1.7/ChangeLog ChangeLog] |
+[http://google-perftools.googlecode.com/svn/tags/perftools-1.7/ChangeLog ChangeLog] |
for full details. |
One architecture-specific change of note is added comments in the |