[Sync] Move 'sync' target to sync/

chrome/browser/sync/sessions/status_controller_unittest.cc

Index: chrome/browser/sync/sessions/status_controller_unittest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/sync/sessions/status_controller_unittest.cc b/chrome/browser/sync/sessions/status_controller_unittest.cc
deleted file mode 100644
index 24827d8c4368c56b80ae2e04df923f70c5eaf5a4..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/chrome/browser/sync/sessions/status_controller_unittest.cc
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,198 +0,0 @@
-// Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
-// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
-// found in the LICENSE file.
-
-#include "chrome/browser/sync/sessions/sync_session.h"
-#include "chrome/browser/sync/test/engine/test_id_factory.h"
-#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
-
-namespace browser_sync {
-namespace sessions {
-
-class StatusControllerTest : public testing::Test {
- public:
-  virtual void SetUp() {
-    routes_[syncable::BOOKMARKS] = GROUP_UI;
-  }
- protected:
-  ModelSafeRoutingInfo routes_;
-};
-
-TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, GetsDirty) {
-  StatusController status(routes_);
-  status.set_num_server_changes_remaining(30);
-  EXPECT_TRUE(status.TestAndClearIsDirty());
-
-  status.set_invalid_store(true);
-  EXPECT_TRUE(status.TestAndClearIsDirty());
-  status.set_invalid_store(false);
-  EXPECT_TRUE(status.TestAndClearIsDirty());
-
-  status.increment_num_successful_commits();
-  EXPECT_TRUE(status.TestAndClearIsDirty());
-  status.increment_num_successful_commits();
-  EXPECT_TRUE(status.TestAndClearIsDirty());
-
-  {
-    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_UI);
-    status.mutable_conflict_progress()->
-        AddSimpleConflictingItemById(syncable::Id());
-  }
-  EXPECT_TRUE(status.TestAndClearIsDirty());
-
-  std::vector<int64> v;
-  v.push_back(1);
-  status.set_unsynced_handles(v);
-  EXPECT_TRUE(status.TestAndClearIsDirty());
-  std::vector<int64> v2;
-  v2.push_back(1);
-  status.set_unsynced_handles(v2);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(status.TestAndClearIsDirty());  // Test for deep comparison.
-}
-
-TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, StaysClean) {
-  StatusController status(routes_);
-  status.update_conflicts_resolved(true);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(status.TestAndClearIsDirty());
-
-  status.set_items_committed();
-  EXPECT_FALSE(status.TestAndClearIsDirty());
-
-  OrderedCommitSet commits(routes_);
-  commits.AddCommitItem(0, syncable::Id(), syncable::BOOKMARKS);
-  status.set_commit_set(commits);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(status.TestAndClearIsDirty());
-}
-
-// This test is useful, as simple as it sounds, due to the copy-paste prone
-// nature of status_controller.cc (we have had bugs in the past where a set_foo
-// method was actually setting |bar_| instead!).
-TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, ReadYourWrites) {
-  StatusController status(routes_);
-  status.set_num_server_changes_remaining(13);
-  EXPECT_EQ(13, status.num_server_changes_remaining());
-
-  EXPECT_FALSE(status.syncer_status().invalid_store);
-  status.set_invalid_store(true);
-  EXPECT_TRUE(status.syncer_status().invalid_store);
-
-  EXPECT_FALSE(status.conflicts_resolved());
-  status.update_conflicts_resolved(true);
-  EXPECT_TRUE(status.conflicts_resolved());
-
-  status.set_last_download_updates_result(SYNCER_OK);
-  EXPECT_EQ(SYNCER_OK, status.error().last_download_updates_result);
-
-  status.set_last_post_commit_result(SYNC_AUTH_ERROR);
-  EXPECT_EQ(SYNC_AUTH_ERROR, status.error().last_post_commit_result);
-
-  status.set_last_process_commit_response_result(SYNC_SERVER_ERROR);
-  EXPECT_EQ(SYNC_SERVER_ERROR,
-            status.error().last_process_commit_response_result);
-
-  for (int i = 0; i < 14; i++)
-    status.increment_num_successful_commits();
-  EXPECT_EQ(14, status.syncer_status().num_successful_commits);
-
-  std::vector<int64> v;
-  v.push_back(16);
-  status.set_unsynced_handles(v);
-  EXPECT_EQ(16, v[0]);
-}
-
-TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, HasConflictingUpdates) {
-  StatusController status(routes_);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(status.HasConflictingUpdates());
-  {
-    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_UI);
-    EXPECT_FALSE(status.update_progress());
-    status.mutable_update_progress()->AddAppliedUpdate(SUCCESS,
-        syncable::Id());
-    status.mutable_update_progress()->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT_SIMPLE,
-        syncable::Id());
-    EXPECT_TRUE(status.update_progress()->HasConflictingUpdates());
-  }
-
-  EXPECT_TRUE(status.HasConflictingUpdates());
-
-  {
-    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_PASSIVE);
-    EXPECT_FALSE(status.update_progress());
-  }
-}
-
-TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, HasConflictingUpdates_NonBlockingUpdates) {
-  StatusController status(routes_);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(status.HasConflictingUpdates());
-  {
-    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_UI);
-    EXPECT_FALSE(status.update_progress());
-    status.mutable_update_progress()->AddAppliedUpdate(SUCCESS,
-        syncable::Id());
-    status.mutable_update_progress()->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT_HIERARCHY,
-        syncable::Id());
-    EXPECT_TRUE(status.update_progress()->HasConflictingUpdates());
-  }
-
-  EXPECT_TRUE(status.HasConflictingUpdates());
-}
-
-TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, CountUpdates) {
-  StatusController status(routes_);
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, status.CountUpdates());
-  ClientToServerResponse* response(status.mutable_updates_response());
-  sync_pb::SyncEntity* entity1 = response->mutable_get_updates()->add_entries();
-  sync_pb::SyncEntity* entity2 = response->mutable_get_updates()->add_entries();
-  ASSERT_TRUE(entity1 != NULL && entity2 != NULL);
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, status.CountUpdates());
-}
-
-// Test TotalNumConflictingItems
-TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, TotalNumConflictingItems) {
-  StatusController status(routes_);
-  TestIdFactory f;
-  {
-    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_UI);
-    EXPECT_FALSE(status.conflict_progress());
-    status.mutable_conflict_progress()->
-        AddSimpleConflictingItemById(f.NewLocalId());
-    status.mutable_conflict_progress()->
-        AddSimpleConflictingItemById(f.NewLocalId());
-    EXPECT_EQ(2, status.conflict_progress()->SimpleConflictingItemsSize());
-  }
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, status.TotalNumConflictingItems());
-  {
-    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_DB);
-    EXPECT_FALSE(status.conflict_progress());
-    status.mutable_conflict_progress()->
-        AddSimpleConflictingItemById(f.NewLocalId());
-    status.mutable_conflict_progress()->
-        AddSimpleConflictingItemById(f.NewLocalId());
-    EXPECT_EQ(2, status.conflict_progress()->SimpleConflictingItemsSize());
-  }
-  EXPECT_EQ(4, status.TotalNumConflictingItems());
-}
-
-// Basic test that non group-restricted state accessors don't cause violations.
-TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, Unrestricted) {
-  StatusController status(routes_);
-  const UpdateProgress* progress =
-      status.GetUnrestrictedUpdateProgress(GROUP_UI);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(progress);
-  status.mutable_commit_message();
-  status.commit_response();
-  status.mutable_commit_response();
-  status.updates_response();
-  status.mutable_updates_response();
-  status.error();
-  status.syncer_status();
-  status.num_server_changes_remaining();
-  status.commit_ids();
-  status.HasBookmarkCommitActivity();
-  status.download_updates_succeeded();
-  status.ServerSaysNothingMoreToDownload();
-  status.group_restriction();
-}
-
-}  // namespace sessions
-}  // namespace browser_sync