Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(189)

Issue 9605042: Never let the hole escape... (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 9 months ago by Sven Panne
Modified:
8 years, 9 months ago
Reviewers:
ulan, fschneider
CC:
v8-dev
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Never let the hole escape... Committed: https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=10951

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 3
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+25 lines, -6 lines) Patch
M src/objects.h View 1 chunk +3 lines, -0 lines 1 comment Download
M src/objects.cc View 3 chunks +8 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M src/runtime.cc View 2 chunks +4 lines, -4 lines 2 comments Download
M test/mjsunit/object-define-property.js View 1 chunk +10 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4 (0 generated)
Sven Panne
8 years, 9 months ago (2012-03-07 09:45:18 UTC) #1
ulan
LGTM http://codereview.chromium.org/9605042/diff/1/src/objects.h File src/objects.h (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/9605042/diff/1/src/objects.h#newcode7948 src/objects.h:7948: Object* SafeGet(AccessorComponent component); Consider marking this function as ...
8 years, 9 months ago (2012-03-07 09:59:34 UTC) #2
fschneider
dbc: http://codereview.chromium.org/9605042/diff/1/src/runtime.cc File src/runtime.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/9605042/diff/1/src/runtime.cc#newcode10497 src/runtime.cc:10497: details->set(3, AccessorPair::cast(*result_callback_obj)->getter()); Is this call-site safe?
8 years, 9 months ago (2012-03-07 10:32:25 UTC) #3
Sven Panne
8 years, 9 months ago (2012-03-07 10:38:10 UTC) #4
http://codereview.chromium.org/9605042/diff/1/src/runtime.cc
File src/runtime.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/9605042/diff/1/src/runtime.cc#newcode10497
src/runtime.cc:10497: details->set(3,
AccessorPair::cast(*result_callback_obj)->getter());
On 2012/03/07 10:32:25, fschneider wrote:
> Is this call-site safe?

Good point, it's very probably not. New CL approaching... :-P

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698