Change labeled statement to use visitSubGraph for its body instead of marking its "exit block" spec…

frog/tests/leg_only/src/BreakTest.dart

Index: frog/tests/leg_only/src/BreakTest.dart
diff --git a/frog/tests/leg_only/src/BreakTest.dart b/frog/tests/leg_only/src/BreakTest.dart
index 1ffddda04fed780aa05e0ac1a9b112592ec7c55f..34895a1b6cc5ef00df8d930eee05a0c8ab81ea3a 100644
--- a/frog/tests/leg_only/src/BreakTest.dart
+++ b/frog/tests/leg_only/src/BreakTest.dart
@@ -99,6 +99,30 @@ obscureBreaks(x) {
   return result;
 }
 
+ifBreaks(x, y) {
+  int res = 2;
+  foo: if (x == 1) bar: {
+         if (y == 2) {
+           res = 4;
+           break foo;
+         } else if (y == 3) {
+           res = 5;
+           break bar;
+         }
+         res = 3;
+       } else baz: {
+         if (y == 2) {
+           res = 7;
+           break foo;
+         } else if (y == 3) {
+           res = 8;
+           break baz;
+         }
+         res = 6;
+       }

[ngeoffray, 2012/03/06 11:17:37]

indentation is still off :)

[Lasse Reichstein Nielsen, 2012/03/08 09:02:02]

That's actually deliberate, because I indent relative to the if. I should
probably indent relative to the foo: label.

+  return res;
+}
+
 main() {
   break1(2, 3, 2, 1);
   break1(2, 4, 3, 1);
@@ -117,4 +141,10 @@ main() {
   Expect.isTrue(obscureBreaks(3), "3");
   Expect.isTrue(obscureBreaks(4), "4");
   Expect.isFalse(obscureBreaks(5), "5");
-}
+  Expect.equals(3, ifBreaks(1, 4));
+  Expect.equals(4, ifBreaks(1, 2));
+  Expect.equals(5, ifBreaks(1, 3));
+  Expect.equals(6, ifBreaks(2, 4));
+  Expect.equals(7, ifBreaks(2, 2));
+  Expect.equals(8, ifBreaks(2, 3));
+}