Draft implementation of c++ bindings generation.

client/dom/templates/dom/native/cpp_callback_header.template

Index: client/dom/templates/dom/native/cpp_callback_header.template
diff --git a/client/dom/templates/dom/native/cpp_callback_header.template b/client/dom/templates/dom/native/cpp_callback_header.template
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5ae8d909a2474e55cada7cfb3819183d83f451b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/client/dom/templates/dom/native/cpp_callback_header.template
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2012, the Dart project authors.  Please see the AUTHORS file
+// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
+// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+// WARNING: Do not edit - generated code.
+
+#ifndef Dart$(INTERFACE)_h
+#define Dart$(INTERFACE)_h
+
+#include "ActiveDOMCallback.h"
+#include "DartCallback.h"
+#include "DartDOMWrapper.h"
+#include "$(INTERFACE).h"
+
+namespace WebCore {
+
+class Dart$(INTERFACE) : public $(INTERFACE), public ActiveDOMCallback {
+public:
+    typedef $(INTERFACE) NativeType;
+
+    static PassRefPtr<NativeType> toNative(Dart_Handle object, Dart_Handle& exception)
+    {
+        return adoptRef(new Dart$(INTERFACE)(object, exception, DartUtilities::scriptExecutionContext()));
+    }
+$HANDLERS
+
+private:
+    Dart$(INTERFACE)(Dart_Handle object, Dart_Handle& exception, ScriptExecutionContext* context)
+        : ActiveDOMCallback(context)
+        , m_callback(object, exception)
+    {
+    }
+
+    DartCallback m_callback;
+};
+
+}
+
+#endif // Dart$(INTERFACE)_h

[antonm, 2012/02/06 13:45:51]

nit: do we need this trailing // Dart$(INTERFACE) ?

[podivilov, 2012/02/10 15:59:37]

Yes, most webcore headers have them. Old bindings also had them. Why do you
think we should remove them from here?

[antonm, 2012/02/10 16:01:07]

Some time ago I was told by ap that they are not required any more.  Things may
have changed again since then.  Anyway, cosmetic, feel free to ignore.

On 2012/02/10 15:59:37, podivilov wrote: