Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(77)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/services/gcm/push_messaging_browsertest.cc

Issue 785993003: [Push] Register: require user-visible to be present in the manifest (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 6 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/services/gcm/push_messaging_browsertest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/services/gcm/push_messaging_browsertest.cc b/chrome/browser/services/gcm/push_messaging_browsertest.cc
index 6dfd3b1ac50d09073524549acca3712bdec53ab3..1fb79b9a205651369ff1c433d249d3a9ac92655f 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/services/gcm/push_messaging_browsertest.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/services/gcm/push_messaging_browsertest.cc
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ class PushMessagingBrowserTest : public InProcessBrowserTest {
InProcessBrowserTest::SetUpOnMainThread();
}
- void loadTestPage() {
+ virtual void loadTestPage() {
ui_test_utils::NavigateToURL(
browser(), https_server_->GetURL("files/push_messaging/test.html"));
}
@@ -162,14 +162,34 @@ class PushMessagingBrowserTest : public InProcessBrowserTest {
gcm_service_->push_messaging_service());
}
- private:
+ protected:
Michael van Ouwerkerk 2014/12/10 18:36:33 This should still be private. We have public gette
Miguel Garcia 2014/12/11 11:37:08 Done.
scoped_ptr<net::SpawnedTestServer> https_server_;
FakeGCMProfileService* gcm_service_;
DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(PushMessagingBrowserTest);
};
-IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(PushMessagingBrowserTest, RegisterSuccess) {
+class PushMessagingBadManifestBrowserTest : public PushMessagingBrowserTest {
+ void loadTestPage() override {
Michael van Ouwerkerk 2014/12/10 18:36:33 Instead of subclassing, you could add a loadTestPa
Miguel Garcia 2014/12/11 11:37:08 mm not sure I agree here, the way this is structur
+ ui_test_utils::NavigateToURL(
+ browser(),
+ https_server_->GetURL("files/push_messaging/test_bad_manifest.html"));
+ };
+};
+
+IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(PushMessagingBadManifestBrowserTest,
+ RegisterFailsNotVisibleMessages) {
+ std::string script_result;
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(RunScript("registerServiceWorker()", &script_result));
+ ASSERT_EQ("ok - service worker registered", script_result);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(RunScript("registerPush()", &script_result));
+ EXPECT_EQ("AbortError - Registration failed - permission denied",
+ script_result);
+}
+
+IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(PushMessagingBrowserTest,
+ RegisterSuccessNotificationsGranted) {
std::string script_result;
ASSERT_TRUE(RunScript("registerServiceWorker()", &script_result));
@@ -188,15 +208,19 @@ IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(PushMessagingBrowserTest, RegisterSuccess) {
}
IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(PushMessagingBrowserTest,
- RegisterFailureNoPushPermission) {
+ RegisterSuccessNotificationsPrompt) {
std::string script_result;
ASSERT_TRUE(RunScript("registerServiceWorker()", &script_result));
ASSERT_EQ("ok - service worker registered", script_result);
+ InfoBarResponder accepting_responder(browser(), true);
ASSERT_TRUE(RunScript("registerPush()", &script_result));
- EXPECT_EQ("AbortError - Registration failed - permission denied",
- script_result);
+ EXPECT_EQ(std::string(kPushMessagingEndpoint) + " - 1", script_result);
+
+ PushMessagingApplicationId app_id(https_server()->GetURL(""), 0L);
+ EXPECT_EQ(app_id.ToString(), gcm_service()->last_registered_app_id());
+ EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", gcm_service()->last_registered_sender_ids()[0]);
}
IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(PushMessagingBrowserTest,

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698