Chromium Code Reviews| Index: README.md |
| diff --git a/README.md b/README.md |
| new file mode 100644 |
| index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..619a51d57dd4bf2bb0e26b39ab1a11cc1fe3f241 |
| --- /dev/null |
| +++ b/README.md |
| @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ |
| +Handles version numbers and version constraints in the same way that [pub][] |
| +does. The semantics here very closely follow the [Semantic Versioning][semver] |
| +spec. It differs from semver in a few corner cases: |
| + |
| + * **Version ordering does take build suffixes into account.** This is unlike |
| + semver 2.0.0 but like earlier versions of semver. Version `1.2.3+1` is |
| + considered a lower number than `1.2.3+2`. |
| + |
| + Since a package may have published multiple versions that differ only by |
| + build suffix, pub still has to pick one of them *somehow*. Semver leaves |
| + that issue unresolved, so we just say that build numbers are sorted like |
| + pre-release suffixes. |
| + |
| + * **Pre-release versions are excluded from most max ranges.** Let's say a |
| + user is depending on "foo" with constraint `>=1.0.0 <2.0.0` and that "foo" |
| + has published these versions: |
| + |
| + * `1.0.0` |
| + * `1.1.0` |
| + * `1.2.0` |
| + * `2.0.0-alpha` |
| + * `2.0.0-beta` |
| + * `2.0.0` |
| + * `2.1.0` |
| + |
| + Versions `2.0.0` and `2.1.0` are excluded by the constraint since neither |
| + matches `<2.0.0`. However, since semver specifies that pre-release versions |
| + are lower than the non-prerelease version (i.e. `2.0.0-beta < 2.0.0`, then |
| + the `<2.0.0` constraint does technically allow those. |
| + |
| + But that's almost never what the user wants. If their package doesn't work |
| + with foo `2.0.0`, it's certainly not likely to work with experimental, |
| + unstable versions of `2.0.0`'s API, which is what pre-release versions |
| + represent. |
| + |
| + To handle that, `<` version ranges to not allow pre-release versions of the |
| + maximum unless the max is itself a pre-release. In other words, a `<2.0.0` |
| + constraint will prohibit not just `2.0.0` but any pre-release of `2.0.0`. |
| + However, `<2.0.0-beta` will exclude `2.0.0-beta` but allow `2.0.0-alpha`. |
| + |
| + * **Pre-release versions are avoided when possible.** The above case |
| + handles pre-release versions at the top of the range, but what about in |
| + the middle? What if "foo" has these versions: |
| + |
| + * `1.0.0` |
| + * `1.2.0-alpha` |
| + * `1.2.0` |
| + * `1.3.0-experimental` |
| + |
| + When a number of versions are valid, pub chooses the best one where "best" |
| + usually means "highest numbered". That follows the user's intuition that, |
| + all else being equal, they want the latest and greatest. Here, that would |
| + mean `1.3.0-experimental`. However, most users don't want to use unstable |
| + versions of their dependencies. |
| + |
| + We want pre-releases to be explicitly opt-in so that package consumers |
| + don't get unpleasant surprises and so that package maintainers are free to |
| + put out pre-releases and get feedback without dragging all of their users |
| + onto the bleeding edge. |
| + |
| + To accommodate that, when pub is choosing a version, it uses *priority* |
| + order which is different from strict comparison ordering. Any stable version is considered higher priority than any unstable version. The above versions, in priority order, are: |
|
nweiz
2014/09/25 22:52:02
Long line.
Bob Nystrom
2014/09/26 19:41:07
Done.
|
| + |
| + * `1.2.0-alpha` |
| + * `1.3.0-experimental` |
| + * `1.0.0` |
| + * `1.2.0` |
| + |
| + This ensures that users only end up with an unstable version when there are |
| + no alternatives. Usually this means they've picked a constraint that |
| + specifically selects that unstable version -- they've deliberately opted in |
| + to it. |
|
nweiz
2014/09/25 22:52:02
Nit: "in to" -> "into"
Bob Nystrom
2014/09/26 19:41:07
Done.
|
| + |
| +[pub]: http://pub.dartlang.org/ |
| +[semver]: http://semver.org/ |