On 2014/06/27 18:53:11, agable wrote:
> On 2014/06/27 18:26:22, Vadim Sh. wrote:
> > why git2? :) Do we have git 1 in infra/infra? Alternatives: 'git',
'gitlib'..
> > dunno.
>
> Agreed -- I think now is the time to absorb git into these, and fix
lkgr-finder
> to use these instead.
I'd rather do in a followup CL. AFAIK, neither lkgr nor git have any tests, so
I'd rather refactor them separately (preferably after, you know, adding tests
:p).
6 from infra.libs.git2.util import CalledProcessError
7
8 from infra.libs.git2.git2 import Commit
9 from infra.libs.git2.git2 import Ref
10 from infra.libs.git2.git2 import Repo
agable
2014/06/27 18:53:11
Inconsistent between listing these all on their ow
Inconsistent between listing these all on their own lines vs. all on one line as
you do in data_structures/ and decorators/.
iannucci
2014/06/28 08:33:35
I'm torn, but looks like google python style says
On 2014/06/27 18:53:11, agable wrote:
> Inconsistent between listing these all on their own lines vs. all on one line
as
> you do in data_structures/ and decorators/.
Issue 355153002: Refactor infra git libs and testing.
(Closed)
Created 6 years, 5 months ago by iannucci
Modified 6 years, 5 months ago
Reviewers: agable, Vadim Sh.
Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/infra/infra@fake_testing_support
Comments: 41