Adding rule frames to the ONC spec.

Adding rule frames to the ONC spec.
Also clarifying some of the field descriptions.

BUG=None


Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=182568

[David Roche, 2013-02-13 12:57:09]

https://codereview.chromium.org/12255005/diff/1/chromeos/docs/onc_spec.html
File chromeos/docs/onc_spec.html (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/12255005/diff/1/chromeos/docs/onc_spec.html#n...
chromeos/docs/onc_spec.html:433: <span class="rule_id"></span> Must be a number
in the range [1, 32] for
Previous lines keep the rule_id span on its own line.  Put it on its own line
here, for consistency?

https://codereview.chromium.org/12255005/diff/1/chromeos/docs/onc_spec.html#n...
chromeos/docs/onc_spec.html:539: are <span class="value">None</span>, <span
class="value">WEP-PSK</span>,
rule_id on own line, and separating the two value here, to be consistent with
the next 3 lines?

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2013-02-13 13:09:15]

https://codereview.chromium.org/12255005/diff/1/chromeos/docs/onc_spec.html
File chromeos/docs/onc_spec.html (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/12255005/diff/1/chromeos/docs/onc_spec.html#n...
chromeos/docs/onc_spec.html:433: <span class="rule_id"></span> Must be a number
in the range [1, 32] for
On 2013/02/13 12:57:09, David Roche wrote:
> Previous lines keep the rule_id span on its own line.  Put it on its own line
> here, for consistency?

Done.

https://codereview.chromium.org/12255005/diff/1/chromeos/docs/onc_spec.html#n...
chromeos/docs/onc_spec.html:539: are <span class="value">None</span>, <span
class="value">WEP-PSK</span>,
On 2013/02/13 12:57:09, David Roche wrote:
> rule_id on own line, and separating the two value here, to be consistent with
> the next 3 lines?

Done.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-02-13 13:55:04]

No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer or
a lowly provisional committer, _not_ a full super star committer.
See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.

[David Roche, 2013-02-13 13:55:06]

lgtm

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-02-13 13:56:43]

No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer or
a lowly provisional committer, _not_ a full super star committer.
See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2013-02-13 13:58:04]

@Greg, please take a look. CQ requires a full committer to review the CL.

[Greg Spencer (Chromium), 2013-02-13 17:20:22]

lgtm

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-02-14 09:35:40]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/pneubeck@chromium.org/12255005/4001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-02-14 22:26:43]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/pneubeck@chromium.org/12255005/4001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-02-14 23:13:32]

Change committed as 182568