OWNERS for chrome/browser/first_run/

OWNERS for chrome/browser/first_run/

NOTRY=True


Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=175335

[gab, 2013-01-04 19:34:05]

Can I get an LGTM from everyone involved (see email labelled
"chrome/browser/first_run/OWNERS" for full discussion).

Jeremy had volunteered for Mac, but it turns out there really isn't much at all
in *_mac*... Nico if you insist I can put him for Mac, but I don't see the
point.

Cheers!
Gab

[Nico, 2013-01-04 20:04:59]

On 2013/01/04 19:34:05, gab wrote:
> Can I get an LGTM from everyone involved (see email labelled
> "chrome/browser/first_run/OWNERS" for full discussion).
> 
> Jeremy had volunteered for Mac, but it turns out there really isn't much at
all
> in *_mac*... Nico if you insist I can put him for Mac, but I don't see the
> point.

Can you just leave that out then? You guys can take care of simple things, and
for complicated things I'm as clueless as you are.

[gab, 2013-01-04 20:20:14]

On 2013/01/04 20:04:59, Nico wrote:
> On 2013/01/04 19:34:05, gab wrote:
> > Can I get an LGTM from everyone involved (see email labelled
> > "chrome/browser/first_run/OWNERS" for full discussion).
> > 
> > Jeremy had volunteered for Mac, but it turns out there really isn't much at
> all
> > in *_mac*... Nico if you insist I can put him for Mac, but I don't see the
> > point.
> 
> Can you just leave that out then? You guys can take care of simple things, and
> for complicated things I'm as clueless as you are.

i.e. only make us the OWNERS of all of it? I guess that's ok, but none of us
will be able to review complex changes to linux/mac if need be...

[Nico, 2013-01-04 20:21:29]

On 2013/01/04 20:20:14, gab wrote:
> On 2013/01/04 20:04:59, Nico wrote:
> > On 2013/01/04 19:34:05, gab wrote:
> > > Can I get an LGTM from everyone involved (see email labelled
> > > "chrome/browser/first_run/OWNERS" for full discussion).
> > > 
> > > Jeremy had volunteered for Mac, but it turns out there really isn't much
at
> > all
> > > in *_mac*... Nico if you insist I can put him for Mac, but I don't see the
> > > point.
> > 
> > Can you just leave that out then? You guys can take care of simple things,
and
> > for complicated things I'm as clueless as you are.
> 
> i.e. only make us the OWNERS of all of it? I guess that's ok, but none of us
> will be able to review complex changes to linux/mac if need be...

That's fine, you can cc someone else (worst case me, and then I cc jeremy :-P)
if a complex mac/linux first run change comes in.

[gab, 2013-01-04 20:30:38]

On 2013/01/04 20:21:29, Nico wrote:
> On 2013/01/04 20:20:14, gab wrote:
> > On 2013/01/04 20:04:59, Nico wrote:
> > > On 2013/01/04 19:34:05, gab wrote:
> > > > Can I get an LGTM from everyone involved (see email labelled
> > > > "chrome/browser/first_run/OWNERS" for full discussion).
> > > > 
> > > > Jeremy had volunteered for Mac, but it turns out there really isn't much
> at
> > > all
> > > > in *_mac*... Nico if you insist I can put him for Mac, but I don't see
the
> > > > point.
> > > 
> > > Can you just leave that out then? You guys can take care of simple things,
> and
> > > for complicated things I'm as clueless as you are.
> > 
> > i.e. only make us the OWNERS of all of it? I guess that's ok, but none of us
> > will be able to review complex changes to linux/mac if need be...
> 
> That's fine, you can cc someone else (worst case me, and then I cc jeremy :-P)
> if a complex mac/linux first run change comes in.

Ok fine, done.
@grt/cpu: What do you think?

[cpu_(ooo_6.6-7.5), 2013-01-04 20:35:29]

lgtm

we can iterate if things are not working.

[Nico, 2013-01-04 20:36:14]

lgtm

[grt (UTC plus 2), 2013-01-07 14:43:13]

lgtm

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-01-07 15:07:14]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/gab@chromium.org/11759024/13002

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-01-07 15:07:25]

Change committed as 175335