Small patch to fix the "linux_redux" Chromium build.

Small patch to fix the "linux_redux" Chromium build.

Trying to DEPS roll the previous patch, which updates the
library to 1.0.1c, doesn't work for the following reason:

- third_party/libjingle is now referencing DTLSv1_client_method
  and DTLSv1_server_method, which were missing from openssl.gyp
  (this affects both Android and linux_redux builds).

- The piii/k8 configuration files didn't disable CAST5 and
  Whirlpool like the Android one, and the corresponding source
  files are missing from openssl.gyp.

- The piii config now enables inline assembly, but the
  source repository is missing the assembly source for
  the ia32 OPENSSL_setup_cpuid() function.

This patch is used to fix these issues in the most straightforward
way. It is possible to address the issues by adding missing source
files, but I'd rather do this in the upstream Android external/openssl
tree first, to minimize the differences between them.

BUG=137071
TEST=Passed net_unittests on both linux_redux and Android builds.

[digit1, 2012-12-07 13:20:05]

Just to add a little bit of context, the previous DEPS roll failed, with details
at https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/11413143/

To test this, you'll need a similar fix to ssl_client_socket_openssl.cc than the
one in 11413143.

As said in the subject, this is a quick work-around for build issues. I don't
know if Cast and Whirlpool are necessary. The Android system team told me they
were not necessary for SSL, and that they preferred to remove it to reduce code
size.

If you prefer to have these enabled, please let me know.

[agl, 2012-12-07 13:38:21]

CAST5 only has significant use in OpenPGP as far as I'm aware, I think it's fine
to omit it here.

SHA0 is completely dead to my knowledge and I don't know of any uses, or
potential uses, for Whirlpool so that's good to go too.

[digit1, 2012-12-07 17:02:39]

Thank you Adam, it's always good to have an expert's advice :)
anybody for a lgtm?

[Ryan Sleevi, 2012-12-07 17:06:01]

Lgtm
On Dec 7, 2012 9:02 AM, <digit@chromium.org> wrote:

> Thank you Adam, it's always good to have an expert's advice :)
> anybody for a lgtm?
>
>
https://chromiumcodereview.**appspot.com/11467016/<https://chromiumcodereview...
>

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2012-12-07 17:10:43]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/digit@chromium.org/11467016/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2012-12-07 17:10:52]

Change committed as 171794