PPB_UDPSocket_Private is switched to the new Pepper proxy.

content/browser/renderer_host/pepper/content_browser_pepper_host_factory.cc

 // Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
 // found in the LICENSE file.
 
 #include "content/browser/renderer_host/pepper/content_browser_pepper_host_factory.h"
 
 #include "content/browser/renderer_host/pepper/browser_ppapi_host_impl.h"
 #include "content/browser/renderer_host/pepper/pepper_browser_font_singleton_host.h"
 #include "content/browser/renderer_host/pepper/pepper_flash_file_message_filter.h"
 #include "content/browser/renderer_host/pepper/pepper_gamepad_host.h"
 #include "content/browser/renderer_host/pepper/pepper_print_settings_manager.h"
 #include "content/browser/renderer_host/pepper/pepper_printing_host.h"
+#include "content/browser/renderer_host/pepper/pepper_udp_socket_private_host.h"
 #include "ppapi/host/message_filter_host.h"
 #include "ppapi/host/ppapi_host.h"
 #include "ppapi/host/resource_host.h"
 #include "ppapi/proxy/ppapi_messages.h"
 #include "ppapi/shared_impl/ppapi_permissions.h"
 
 using ppapi::host::MessageFilterHost;
 using ppapi::host::ResourceHost;
 using ppapi::host::ResourceMessageFilter;
 
@@ skipping 18 matching lines @@
   if (!host_->IsValidInstance(instance))
     return scoped_ptr<ResourceHost>();
 
   // Public interfaces.
   switch (message.type()) {
     case PpapiHostMsg_Gamepad_Create::ID:
       return scoped_ptr<ResourceHost>(new PepperGamepadHost(
           host_, instance, params.pp_resource()));
   }
 
+  // Private interfaces.
+  if (host_->GetPpapiHost()->permissions().HasPermission(

[raymes, 2013/01/13 20:47:58]

Please use GetPermissions() as in the cases below.

[ygorshenin1, 2013/01/14 08:47:43]

Done.

+          ppapi::PERMISSION_PRIVATE) ||
+      message.type() == PpapiHostMsg_UDPSocketPrivate_Create::ID) {

[raymes, 2013/01/13 20:47:58]

This part is unusual and subtle. Can you explain why this is needed? Is there an
alternative to having this special case? We should at least add a comment here
explaining where the permissions check is done.

[ygorshenin1, 2013/01/14 08:47:43]

Done.

+    switch (message.type()) {
+      case PpapiHostMsg_UDPSocketPrivate_Create::ID:
+        return scoped_ptr<ResourceHost>(new PepperUDPSocketPrivateHost(
+            host_, instance, params.pp_resource()));
+    }
+  }
+
   // Dev interfaces.
   if (GetPermissions().HasPermission(ppapi::PERMISSION_DEV)) {
     switch (message.type()) {
       case PpapiHostMsg_Printing_Create::ID: {
          scoped_ptr<PepperPrintSettingsManager> manager(
              new PepperPrintSettingsManagerImpl());
          return scoped_ptr<ResourceHost>(new PepperPrintingHost(
              host_->GetPpapiHost(), instance,
              params.pp_resource(), manager.Pass()));
       }
@@ skipping 24 matching lines @@
 
   return scoped_ptr<ResourceHost>();
 }
 
 const ppapi::PpapiPermissions&
 ContentBrowserPepperHostFactory::GetPermissions() const {
   return host_->GetPpapiHost()->permissions();
 }
 
 }  // namespace content