Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(225)

Side by Side Diff: sandbox/linux/sandbox_linux.gypi

Issue 11411254: SECCOMP-BPF: Added supported for inspection system call arguments from BPF filters. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Changelist is ready for initial review; still needs a few TODO()s to be resolved, though. Created 8 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch | Annotate | Revision Log
OLDNEW
1 # Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. 1 # Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
2 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be 2 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
3 # found in the LICENSE file. 3 # found in the LICENSE file.
4 4
5 { 5 {
6 'targets': [ 6 'targets': [
7 # We have two principal targets: sandbox and sandbox_linux_unittests 7 # We have two principal targets: sandbox and sandbox_linux_unittests
8 # All other targets are listed as dependencies. 8 # All other targets are listed as dependencies.
9 # FIXME(jln): for historial reasons, sandbox_linux is the setuid sandbox 9 # FIXME(jln): for historial reasons, sandbox_linux is the setuid sandbox
10 # and is its own target. 10 # and is its own target.
(...skipping 49 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
60 'seccomp-bpf/syscall_iterator_unittest.cc', 60 'seccomp-bpf/syscall_iterator_unittest.cc',
61 'seccomp-bpf/syscall_unittest.cc', 61 'seccomp-bpf/syscall_unittest.cc',
62 ], 62 ],
63 }], 63 }],
64 ], 64 ],
65 }, 65 },
66 { 66 {
67 'target_name': 'seccomp_bpf', 67 'target_name': 'seccomp_bpf',
68 'type': 'static_library', 68 'type': 'static_library',
69 'sources': [ 69 'sources': [
70 # NOTE: Order matters, if building w/ ninja
jln (very slow on Chromium) 2012/12/06 00:35:00 That is puzzling. It would be worth checking with
71 'seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.h',
72 'seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.cc',
70 'seccomp-bpf/basicblock.cc', 73 'seccomp-bpf/basicblock.cc',
71 'seccomp-bpf/basicblock.h', 74 'seccomp-bpf/basicblock.h',
72 'seccomp-bpf/codegen.cc', 75 'seccomp-bpf/codegen.cc',
73 'seccomp-bpf/codegen.h', 76 'seccomp-bpf/codegen.h',
74 'seccomp-bpf/die.cc', 77 'seccomp-bpf/die.cc',
75 'seccomp-bpf/die.h', 78 'seccomp-bpf/die.h',
76 'seccomp-bpf/errorcode.cc', 79 'seccomp-bpf/errorcode.cc',
77 'seccomp-bpf/errorcode.h', 80 'seccomp-bpf/errorcode.h',
78 'seccomp-bpf/instruction.h', 81 'seccomp-bpf/instruction.h',
79 'seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.cc',
80 'seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.h',
81 'seccomp-bpf/syscall.cc', 82 'seccomp-bpf/syscall.cc',
82 'seccomp-bpf/syscall.h', 83 'seccomp-bpf/syscall.h',
83 'seccomp-bpf/syscall_iterator.cc', 84 'seccomp-bpf/syscall_iterator.cc',
84 'seccomp-bpf/syscall_iterator.h', 85 'seccomp-bpf/syscall_iterator.h',
85 'seccomp-bpf/verifier.cc', 86 'seccomp-bpf/verifier.cc',
86 'seccomp-bpf/verifier.h', 87 'seccomp-bpf/verifier.h',
87 ], 88 ],
88 'dependencies': [ 89 'dependencies': [
89 '../base/base.gyp:base', 90 '../base/base.gyp:base',
90 ], 91 ],
(...skipping 48 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
139 'dependencies': [ 140 'dependencies': [
140 '../base/base.gyp:base', 141 '../base/base.gyp:base',
141 ], 142 ],
142 'include_dirs': [ 143 'include_dirs': [
143 '..', 144 '..',
144 ], 145 ],
145 }, 146 },
146 147
147 ], 148 ],
148 } 149 }
OLDNEW

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698