Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(883)

Unified Diff: third_party/protobuf/java/src/main/java/com/google/protobuf/RpcChannel.java

Issue 11347026: Check in protobuf java code and generate lite jar. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Moved target to android conditional Created 8 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: third_party/protobuf/java/src/main/java/com/google/protobuf/RpcChannel.java
diff --git a/third_party/protobuf/java/src/main/java/com/google/protobuf/RpcChannel.java b/third_party/protobuf/java/src/main/java/com/google/protobuf/RpcChannel.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c6ec54fc913e913ac9e884f3cf9d1e463fc42ff5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/protobuf/java/src/main/java/com/google/protobuf/RpcChannel.java
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+// Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
+// Copyright 2008 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
+// http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+package com.google.protobuf;
+
+/**
+ * <p>Abstract interface for an RPC channel. An {@code RpcChannel} represents a
+ * communication line to a {@link Service} which can be used to call that
+ * {@link Service}'s methods. The {@link Service} may be running on another
+ * machine. Normally, you should not call an {@code RpcChannel} directly, but
+ * instead construct a stub {@link Service} wrapping it. Example:
+ *
+ * <pre>
+ * RpcChannel channel = rpcImpl.newChannel("remotehost.example.com:1234");
+ * RpcController controller = rpcImpl.newController();
+ * MyService service = MyService.newStub(channel);
+ * service.myMethod(controller, request, callback);
+ * </pre>
+ *
+ * <p>Starting with version 2.3.0, RPC implementations should not try to build
+ * on this, but should instead provide code generator plugins which generate
+ * code specific to the particular RPC implementation. This way the generated
+ * code can be more appropriate for the implementation in use and can avoid
+ * unnecessary layers of indirection.
+ *
+ * @author kenton@google.com Kenton Varda
+ */
+public interface RpcChannel {
+ /**
+ * Call the given method of the remote service. This method is similar to
+ * {@code Service.callMethod()} with one important difference: the caller
+ * decides the types of the {@code Message} objects, not the callee. The
+ * request may be of any type as long as
+ * {@code request.getDescriptor() == method.getInputType()}.
+ * The response passed to the callback will be of the same type as
+ * {@code responsePrototype} (which must have
+ * {@code getDescriptor() == method.getOutputType()}).
+ */
+ void callMethod(Descriptors.MethodDescriptor method,
+ RpcController controller,
+ Message request,
+ Message responsePrototype,
+ RpcCallback<Message> done);
+}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698