Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(3)

Unified Diff: third_party/protobuf/java/src/main/java/com/google/protobuf/Service.java

Issue 11347026: Check in protobuf java code and generate lite jar. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Moved target to android conditional Created 8 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: third_party/protobuf/java/src/main/java/com/google/protobuf/Service.java
diff --git a/third_party/protobuf/java/src/main/java/com/google/protobuf/Service.java b/third_party/protobuf/java/src/main/java/com/google/protobuf/Service.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..541585f41fc605a518cc155b68254c92985ee2c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/protobuf/java/src/main/java/com/google/protobuf/Service.java
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+// Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
+// Copyright 2008 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
+// http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+package com.google.protobuf;
+
+/**
+ * Abstract base interface for protocol-buffer-based RPC services. Services
+ * themselves are abstract classes (implemented either by servers or as
+ * stubs), but they subclass this base interface. The methods of this
+ * interface can be used to call the methods of the service without knowing
+ * its exact type at compile time (analogous to the Message interface).
+ *
+ * <p>Starting with version 2.3.0, RPC implementations should not try to build
+ * on this, but should instead provide code generator plugins which generate
+ * code specific to the particular RPC implementation. This way the generated
+ * code can be more appropriate for the implementation in use and can avoid
+ * unnecessary layers of indirection.
+ *
+ * @author kenton@google.com Kenton Varda
+ */
+public interface Service {
+ /**
+ * Get the {@code ServiceDescriptor} describing this service and its methods.
+ */
+ Descriptors.ServiceDescriptor getDescriptorForType();
+
+ /**
+ * <p>Call a method of the service specified by MethodDescriptor. This is
+ * normally implemented as a simple {@code switch()} that calls the standard
+ * definitions of the service's methods.
+ *
+ * <p>Preconditions:
+ * <ul>
+ * <li>{@code method.getService() == getDescriptorForType()}
+ * <li>{@code request} is of the exact same class as the object returned by
+ * {@code getRequestPrototype(method)}.
+ * <li>{@code controller} is of the correct type for the RPC implementation
+ * being used by this Service. For stubs, the "correct type" depends
+ * on the RpcChannel which the stub is using. Server-side Service
+ * implementations are expected to accept whatever type of
+ * {@code RpcController} the server-side RPC implementation uses.
+ * </ul>
+ *
+ * <p>Postconditions:
+ * <ul>
+ * <li>{@code done} will be called when the method is complete. This may be
+ * before {@code callMethod()} returns or it may be at some point in
+ * the future.
+ * <li>The parameter to {@code done} is the response. It must be of the
+ * exact same type as would be returned by
+ * {@code getResponsePrototype(method)}.
+ * <li>If the RPC failed, the parameter to {@code done} will be
+ * {@code null}. Further details about the failure can be found by
+ * querying {@code controller}.
+ * </ul>
+ */
+ void callMethod(Descriptors.MethodDescriptor method,
+ RpcController controller,
+ Message request,
+ RpcCallback<Message> done);
+
+ /**
+ * <p>{@code callMethod()} requires that the request passed in is of a
+ * particular subclass of {@code Message}. {@code getRequestPrototype()}
+ * gets the default instances of this type for a given method. You can then
+ * call {@code Message.newBuilderForType()} on this instance to
+ * construct a builder to build an object which you can then pass to
+ * {@code callMethod()}.
+ *
+ * <p>Example:
+ * <pre>
+ * MethodDescriptor method =
+ * service.getDescriptorForType().findMethodByName("Foo");
+ * Message request =
+ * stub.getRequestPrototype(method).newBuilderForType()
+ * .mergeFrom(input).build();
+ * service.callMethod(method, request, callback);
+ * </pre>
+ */
+ Message getRequestPrototype(Descriptors.MethodDescriptor method);
+
+ /**
+ * Like {@code getRequestPrototype()}, but gets a prototype of the response
+ * message. {@code getResponsePrototype()} is generally not needed because
+ * the {@code Service} implementation constructs the response message itself,
+ * but it may be useful in some cases to know ahead of time what type of
+ * object will be returned.
+ */
+ Message getResponsePrototype(Descriptors.MethodDescriptor method);
+}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698