Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(78)

Unified Diff: test/mjsunit/object-define-property.js

Issue 10907254: Tentatively reenable previous failing test. (Closed) Base URL: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge
Patch Set: Created 8 years, 3 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: test/mjsunit/object-define-property.js
diff --git a/test/mjsunit/object-define-property.js b/test/mjsunit/object-define-property.js
index 970a80334971142dce997beb2f0d4e4b717d0329..7f2d006575013fcb1185a193b2d865ea2cbdf2c4 100644
--- a/test/mjsunit/object-define-property.js
+++ b/test/mjsunit/object-define-property.js
@@ -1056,9 +1056,6 @@ for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
assertEquals(999, o[999]);
-// Regression test: Bizzare behavior on non-strict arguments object.
Michael Starzinger 2012/09/17 14:15:56 Can we keep the original comment?
-// TODO(yangguo): Tests disabled, needs investigation!
-/*
(function test(arg0) {
// Here arguments[0] is a fast alias on arg0.
Object.defineProperty(arguments, "0", {
@@ -1077,7 +1074,7 @@ assertEquals(999, o[999]);
assertEquals(2, arg0);
assertEquals(3, arguments[0]);
})(0);
-*/
+
// Regression test: We should never observe the hole value.
var objectWithGetter = {};
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698