A visitor that builds a map from node to "Usage".

lib/compiler/implementation/dart_backend/placeholder_collector.dart

+// Copyright (c) 2012, the Dart project authors.  Please see the AUTHORS file
+// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
+// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+class SendVisitor extends ResolvedVisitor {
+  final PlaceholderCollector collector;
+
+  SendVisitor(this.collector, TreeElements elements) : super(elements);
+
+  visitSuperSend(Send node) {}
+  visitOperatorSend(Send node) {}
+  visitClosureSend(Send node) {}
+  visitForeignSend(Send node) {}
+
+  String visitDynamicSend(Send node) => tryRenamePrivateId(node);

[Anton Muhin, 2012/08/09 06:34:52]

nit: this method doesn't return String any more, please, remove return type and
do not use => syntax.

BTW, why haven't you got a warning when running unparser test in checked mode?

[Roman, 2012/08/09 07:34:03]

Done. I don't know why, probably returning nothing is not a problem.

+
+  String tryRenamePrivateId(Send node) {

[Anton Muhin, 2012/08/09 06:34:52]

ditto for return type.

[Roman, 2012/08/09 07:34:03]

Done.

+    Node selector = node.selector;
+    assert(selector !== null);
+    if (selector.source.isPrivate()) {
+      collector.makePrivateIdentifier(selector);
+    }
+  }
+
+  visitGetterSend(Send node) {
+    final element = elements[node];
+    // element === null means dynamic property access.
+    // We don't want to rename non top-level element access.
+    if (element === null || !element.isTopLevel()) {
+      tryRenamePrivateId(node);
+      return;
+    }
+    // Unqualified <class> in static invocation, why it's not a type annotation?
+    // Another option would be to process in visitStaticSend, NB:
+    // those elements are not top-level.
+    // OR: unqualified top level.
+    collector.makeElementPlaceholder(node.selector, element);
+    if (node.receiver !== null) {
+      // <lib prefix>.<top level>.
+      collector.makeNullPlaceholder(node.receiver);  // Cut library prefix.
+    }
+  }
+
+  visitStaticSend(Send node) {
+    final element = elements[node];
+    if (!element.isTopLevel()) return;
+    // Another ugly case: <lib prefix>.<top level> is represented as
+    // receiver: lib prefix, selector: top level.
+    collector.makeElementPlaceholder(node.selector, element);
+    if (node.receiver !== null) {
+      assert(elements[node.receiver].isPrefix());
+      // Hack: putting null into map overrides receiver of original node.
+      collector.makeNullPlaceholder(node.receiver);
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+class PlaceholderCollector extends AbstractVisitor {
+  final Compiler compiler;
+  final Map<Node, Placeholder> placeholders;
+  Element currentElement;
+  TreeElements treeElements;
+
+  PlaceholderCollector(this.compiler) :
+      placeholders = new Map<Node, Placeholder>();
+
+  void collectFunctionDeclarationPlaceholder(
+      FunctionElement element, Node node) {
+    if (element.isGenerativeConstructor() || element.isFactoryConstructor()) {
+      // Two complicated cases for class/interface renaming:
+      // 1) class which implements constructors of other interfaces, but not
+      //    implements interfaces themselves:
+      //      0.dart: class C { I(); }
+      //      1.dart and 2.dart: interface I default C { I(); }
+      //    now we have to duplicate our I() constructor in C class with
+      //    proper names.
+      // 2) (even worse for us):
+      //      0.dart: class C { C(); }
+      //      1.dart: interface C default p0.C { C(); }
+      //    the second case is just a bug now.
+      final enclosingClass = element.getEnclosingClass();
+      Node nameNode = node.name;
+      if (nameNode is Send) nameNode = nameNode.receiver;
+      // For cases like class C implements I { I(); }
+      if (nameNode.token.slowToString() == enclosingClass.name.slowToString()) {
+        makeTypePlaceholder(nameNode, enclosingClass.type);
+      }
+    } else if (element.isTopLevel()) {
+      makeElementPlaceholder(node.name, element);
+    }
+  }
+  
+  void collect(Element element, TreeElements elements) {
+    // Skip AbstractFieldElement, it has no node.
+    // Instead getters and setters should be processed explicitly.
+    if (element is AbstractFieldElement) return;
+    if (element.isField()) {
+      currentElement = element;
+      // TODO(smok): In the future make sure we don't process same
+      // variable list element twice, better merge this with emitter logic.
+      element = element.variables;
+    }
+    currentElement = element;
+    treeElements = elements;
+    Node elementNode = element.parseNode(compiler);
+    if (element is FunctionElement) {
+      collectFunctionDeclarationPlaceholder(element, elementNode);
+    }
+    elementNode.accept(this);
+  }
+
+  Type resolveType(TypeAnnotation typeAnnotation) {
+    if (treeElements === null) return null;
+    var result = treeElements.getType(typeAnnotation);
+    // TODO: Have better type resolution.
+    if (result === null) {
+      result = compiler.resolveTypeAnnotation(currentElement, typeAnnotation);
+    }
+    return result;
+  }
+
+  void makeTypePlaceholder(Node node, Type type) {
+    makeElementPlaceholder(node, type.element);
+  }
+
+  void makeNullPlaceholder(Node node) {
+    placeholders[node] = new NullPlaceholder();
+  }
+
+  void makeElementPlaceholder(Node node, Element element) {
+    assert(element !== null);
+    placeholders[node] = new ElementPlaceholder(element);
+  }
+
+  void makePrivateIdentifier(Identifier node) {
+    assert(node !== null);
+    placeholders[node] =
+        new PrivatePlaceholder(currentElement.getLibrary(), node);
+  }
+
+  void internalError(String reason, [Node node]) {
+    compiler.cancel(reason: reason, node: node);
+  }
+
+  visit(Node node) => (node === null) ? null : node.accept(this);
+
+  visitNode(Node node) { node.visitChildren(this); }  // We must go deeper.
+
+  visitClassNode(ClassNode node) {
+    internalError('Should never meet ClassNode', node);
+  }
+
+  void visitIdentifier(Identifier node) {
+    if (node.source.isPrivate()) {
+      makePrivateIdentifier(node);
+    }
+  }
+
+  visitSend(Send send) {
+    new SendVisitor(this, treeElements).visitSend(send);
+    super.visitSend(send);
+  }
+
+  visitTypeAnnotation(TypeAnnotation node) {
+    final type = compiler.resolveTypeAnnotation(currentElement, node);
+    if (type is !InterfaceType) return null;
+    var target = node.typeName;
+    if (node.typeName is Send) {
+      final element = treeElements[node];
+      if (element !== null) {
+        final send = node.typeName.asSend();
+        final hasPrefix = element.lookupConstructor(
+          send.receiver.source, send.selector.source) === null;
+        if (!hasPrefix) target = send.receiver;
+      }
+    }
+    makeTypePlaceholder(target, type);
+    visit(node.typeArguments);

[Anton Muhin, 2012/08/09 06:34:52]

super.visit?

[Roman, 2012/08/09 07:34:03]

I can't! If I use super.visit, we will get into identifier inside type
annotation and may rename top level class.

+  }
+}