Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(180)

Unified Diff: sync/engine/apply_control_data_updates_unittest.cc

Issue 10832286: sync: Introduce control data types (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Add ToFullModelTypeSet() function Created 8 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: sync/engine/apply_control_data_updates_unittest.cc
diff --git a/sync/engine/apply_control_data_updates_unittest.cc b/sync/engine/apply_control_data_updates_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dbfc98d91cd5c4432e3ad026b42e223adcf9df3c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sync/engine/apply_control_data_updates_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,347 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "base/format_macros.h"
+#include "base/location.h"
+#include "base/memory/scoped_ptr.h"
+#include "base/stringprintf.h"
+#include "sync/engine/apply_control_data_updates.h"
+#include "sync/engine/syncer.h"
+#include "sync/engine/syncer_util.h"
+#include "sync/internal_api/public/test/test_entry_factory.h"
+#include "sync/protocol/nigori_specifics.pb.h"
+#include "sync/syncable/mutable_entry.h"
+#include "sync/syncable/nigori_util.h"
+#include "sync/syncable/read_transaction.h"
+#include "sync/syncable/syncable_util.h"
+#include "sync/syncable/write_transaction.h"
+#include "sync/test/engine/fake_model_worker.h"
+#include "sync/test/engine/syncer_command_test.h"
+#include "sync/test/engine/test_id_factory.h"
+#include "sync/test/fake_sync_encryption_handler.h"
+#include "sync/util/cryptographer.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace syncer {
+
+using syncable::MutableEntry;
+using syncable::UNITTEST;
+using syncable::Id;
+
+class ApplyControlDataUpdatesTest : public SyncerCommandTest {
+ public:
+ protected:
+ ApplyControlDataUpdatesTest() {}
+ virtual ~ApplyControlDataUpdatesTest() {}
+
+ virtual void SetUp() {
+ workers()->clear();
+ mutable_routing_info()->clear();
+ workers()->push_back(make_scoped_refptr(new FakeModelWorker(GROUP_UI)));
+ workers()->push_back(
+ make_scoped_refptr(new FakeModelWorker(GROUP_PASSWORD)));
+ (*mutable_routing_info())[BOOKMARKS] = GROUP_UI;
+ (*mutable_routing_info())[PASSWORDS] = GROUP_PASSWORD;
+ (*mutable_routing_info())[NIGORI] = GROUP_PASSIVE;
+ SyncerCommandTest::SetUp();
+ entry_factory_.reset(new TestEntryFactory(directory()));
+
+ syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
+ }
+
+ TestIdFactory id_factory_;
+ scoped_ptr<TestEntryFactory> entry_factory_;
+ private:
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(ApplyControlDataUpdatesTest);
+};
+
+TEST_F(ApplyControlDataUpdatesTest, NigoriUpdate) {
+ // Storing the cryptographer separately is bad, but for this test we
+ // know it's safe.
+ Cryptographer* cryptographer;
+ ModelTypeSet encrypted_types;
+ encrypted_types.Put(PASSWORDS);
+
+ // We start with initial_sync_ended == false. This is wrong, since would have
+ // no nigori node if that were the case. Howerver, it makes it easier to
+ // verify that ApplyControlDataUpdates sets initial_sync_ended correctly.
+ EXPECT_FALSE(directory()->initial_sync_ended_types().Has(NIGORI));
+
+ {
+ syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
+ cryptographer = directory()->GetCryptographer(&trans);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(directory()->GetNigoriHandler()->GetEncryptedTypes(&trans)
+ .Equals(encrypted_types));
+ }
+
+ // Nigori node updates should update the Cryptographer.
+ Cryptographer other_cryptographer(cryptographer->encryptor());
+ KeyParams params = {"localhost", "dummy", "foobar"};
+ other_cryptographer.AddKey(params);
+
+ sync_pb::EntitySpecifics specifics;
+ sync_pb::NigoriSpecifics* nigori = specifics.mutable_nigori();
+ other_cryptographer.GetKeys(nigori->mutable_encrypted());
+ nigori->set_encrypt_everything(true);
+ entry_factory_->CreateUnappliedNewItem(
+ ModelTypeToRootTag(NIGORI), specifics, true);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
+
+ ApplyControlDataUpdates(directory());
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->is_ready());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
+ {
+ syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(directory()->GetNigoriHandler()->GetEncryptedTypes(&trans)
+ .Equals(ModelTypeSet::All()));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(directory()->initial_sync_ended_types().Has(NIGORI));
+ }
+}
+
+TEST_F(ApplyControlDataUpdatesTest, NigoriUpdateForDisabledTypes) {
+ // Storing the cryptographer separately is bad, but for this test we
+ // know it's safe.
+ Cryptographer* cryptographer;
+ ModelTypeSet encrypted_types;
+ encrypted_types.Put(PASSWORDS);
+
+ // We start with initial_sync_ended == false. This is wrong, since would have
+ // no nigori node if that were the case. Howerver, it makes it easier to
+ // verify that ApplyControlDataUpdates sets initial_sync_ended correctly.
+ EXPECT_FALSE(directory()->initial_sync_ended_types().Has(NIGORI));
+
+ {
+ syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
+ cryptographer = directory()->GetCryptographer(&trans);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(directory()->GetNigoriHandler()->GetEncryptedTypes(&trans)
+ .Equals(encrypted_types));
+ }
+
+ // Nigori node updates should update the Cryptographer.
+ Cryptographer other_cryptographer(cryptographer->encryptor());
+ KeyParams params = {"localhost", "dummy", "foobar"};
+ other_cryptographer.AddKey(params);
+
+ sync_pb::EntitySpecifics specifics;
+ sync_pb::NigoriSpecifics* nigori = specifics.mutable_nigori();
+ other_cryptographer.GetKeys(nigori->mutable_encrypted());
+ nigori->set_encrypt_everything(true);
+ entry_factory_->CreateUnappliedNewItem(
+ ModelTypeToRootTag(NIGORI), specifics, true);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
+
+ ApplyControlDataUpdates(directory());
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->is_ready());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
+ {
+ syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(directory()->GetNigoriHandler()->GetEncryptedTypes(&trans)
+ .Equals(ModelTypeSet::All()));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(directory()->initial_sync_ended_types().Has(NIGORI));
+ }
+}
+
+// Create some local unsynced and unencrypted data. Apply a nigori update that
+// turns on encryption for the unsynced data. Ensure we properly encrypt the
+// data as part of the nigori update. Apply another nigori update with no
+// changes. Ensure we ignore already-encrypted unsynced data and that nothing
+// breaks.
+TEST_F(ApplyControlDataUpdatesTest, EncryptUnsyncedChanges) {
+ // Storing the cryptographer separately is bad, but for this test we
+ // know it's safe.
+ Cryptographer* cryptographer;
+ ModelTypeSet encrypted_types;
+ encrypted_types.Put(PASSWORDS);
+ {
+ syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
+ cryptographer = directory()->GetCryptographer(&trans);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(directory()->GetNigoriHandler()->GetEncryptedTypes(&trans)
+ .Equals(encrypted_types));
+
+ // With default encrypted_types, this should be true.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(VerifyUnsyncedChangesAreEncrypted(&trans, encrypted_types));
+
+ Syncer::UnsyncedMetaHandles handles;
+ GetUnsyncedEntries(&trans, &handles);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(handles.empty());
+ }
+
+ // Create unsynced bookmarks without encryption.
+ // First item is a folder
+ Id folder_id = id_factory_.NewLocalId();
+ entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(folder_id, id_factory_.root(), "folder",
+ true, BOOKMARKS, NULL);
+ // Next five items are children of the folder
+ size_t i;
+ size_t batch_s = 5;
+ for (i = 0; i < batch_s; ++i) {
+ entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(id_factory_.NewLocalId(), folder_id,
+ base::StringPrintf("Item %"PRIuS"", i),
+ false, BOOKMARKS, NULL);
+ }
+ // Next five items are children of the root.
+ for (; i < 2*batch_s; ++i) {
+ entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(
+ id_factory_.NewLocalId(), id_factory_.root(),
+ base::StringPrintf("Item %"PRIuS"", i), false,
+ BOOKMARKS, NULL);
+ }
+
+ KeyParams params = {"localhost", "dummy", "foobar"};
+ cryptographer->AddKey(params);
+ sync_pb::EntitySpecifics specifics;
+ sync_pb::NigoriSpecifics* nigori = specifics.mutable_nigori();
+ cryptographer->GetKeys(nigori->mutable_encrypted());
+ nigori->set_encrypt_everything(true);
+ encrypted_types.Put(BOOKMARKS);
+ entry_factory_->CreateUnappliedNewItem(
+ ModelTypeToRootTag(NIGORI), specifics, true);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->is_ready());
+
+ {
+ // Ensure we have unsynced nodes that aren't properly encrypted.
+ syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyUnsyncedChangesAreEncrypted(&trans, encrypted_types));
+
+ Syncer::UnsyncedMetaHandles handles;
+ GetUnsyncedEntries(&trans, &handles);
+ EXPECT_EQ(2*batch_s+1, handles.size());
+ }
+
+ ApplyControlDataUpdates(directory());
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->is_ready());
+ {
+ syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
+
+ // If ProcessUnsyncedChangesForEncryption worked, all our unsynced changes
+ // should be encrypted now.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(directory()->GetNigoriHandler()->GetEncryptedTypes(&trans)
+ .Equals(ModelTypeSet::All()));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(VerifyUnsyncedChangesAreEncrypted(&trans, encrypted_types));
+
+ Syncer::UnsyncedMetaHandles handles;
+ GetUnsyncedEntries(&trans, &handles);
+ EXPECT_EQ(2*batch_s+1, handles.size());
+ }
+
+ // Simulate another nigori update that doesn't change anything.
+ {
+ syncable::WriteTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, UNITTEST, directory());
+ MutableEntry entry(&trans, syncable::GET_BY_SERVER_TAG,
+ ModelTypeToRootTag(NIGORI));
+ ASSERT_TRUE(entry.good());
+ entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_VERSION, entry_factory_->GetNextRevision());
+ entry.Put(syncable::IS_UNAPPLIED_UPDATE, true);
+ }
+
+ ApplyControlDataUpdates(directory());
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->is_ready());
+ {
+ syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
+
+ // All our changes should still be encrypted.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(directory()->GetNigoriHandler()->GetEncryptedTypes(&trans)
+ .Equals(ModelTypeSet::All()));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(VerifyUnsyncedChangesAreEncrypted(&trans, encrypted_types));
+
+ Syncer::UnsyncedMetaHandles handles;
+ GetUnsyncedEntries(&trans, &handles);
+ EXPECT_EQ(2*batch_s+1, handles.size());
+ }
+}
+
+TEST_F(ApplyControlDataUpdatesTest, CannotEncryptUnsyncedChanges) {
+ // Storing the cryptographer separately is bad, but for this test we
+ // know it's safe.
+ Cryptographer* cryptographer;
+ ModelTypeSet encrypted_types;
+ encrypted_types.Put(PASSWORDS);
+ {
+ syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
+ cryptographer = directory()->GetCryptographer(&trans);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(directory()->GetNigoriHandler()->GetEncryptedTypes(&trans)
+ .Equals(encrypted_types));
+
+ // With default encrypted_types, this should be true.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(VerifyUnsyncedChangesAreEncrypted(&trans, encrypted_types));
+
+ Syncer::UnsyncedMetaHandles handles;
+ GetUnsyncedEntries(&trans, &handles);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(handles.empty());
+ }
+
+ // Create unsynced bookmarks without encryption.
+ // First item is a folder
+ Id folder_id = id_factory_.NewLocalId();
+ entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(
+ folder_id, id_factory_.root(), "folder", true,
+ BOOKMARKS, NULL);
+ // Next five items are children of the folder
+ size_t i;
+ size_t batch_s = 5;
+ for (i = 0; i < batch_s; ++i) {
+ entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(id_factory_.NewLocalId(), folder_id,
+ base::StringPrintf("Item %"PRIuS"", i),
+ false, BOOKMARKS, NULL);
+ }
+ // Next five items are children of the root.
+ for (; i < 2*batch_s; ++i) {
+ entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(
+ id_factory_.NewLocalId(), id_factory_.root(),
+ base::StringPrintf("Item %"PRIuS"", i), false,
+ BOOKMARKS, NULL);
+ }
+
+ // We encrypt with new keys, triggering the local cryptographer to be unready
+ // and unable to decrypt data (once updated).
+ Cryptographer other_cryptographer(cryptographer->encryptor());
+ KeyParams params = {"localhost", "dummy", "foobar"};
+ other_cryptographer.AddKey(params);
+ sync_pb::EntitySpecifics specifics;
+ sync_pb::NigoriSpecifics* nigori = specifics.mutable_nigori();
+ other_cryptographer.GetKeys(nigori->mutable_encrypted());
+ nigori->set_encrypt_everything(true);
+ encrypted_types.Put(BOOKMARKS);
+ entry_factory_->CreateUnappliedNewItem(
+ ModelTypeToRootTag(NIGORI), specifics, true);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
+
+ {
+ // Ensure we have unsynced nodes that aren't properly encrypted.
+ syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyUnsyncedChangesAreEncrypted(&trans, encrypted_types));
+ Syncer::UnsyncedMetaHandles handles;
+ GetUnsyncedEntries(&trans, &handles);
+ EXPECT_EQ(2*batch_s+1, handles.size());
+ }
+
+ ApplyControlDataUpdates(directory());
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->is_ready());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
+ {
+ syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
+
+ // Since we have pending keys, we would have failed to encrypt, but the
+ // cryptographer should be updated.
+ EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyUnsyncedChangesAreEncrypted(&trans, encrypted_types));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(directory()->GetNigoriHandler()->GetEncryptedTypes(&trans)
+ .Equals(ModelTypeSet::All()));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->is_ready());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
+
+ Syncer::UnsyncedMetaHandles handles;
+ GetUnsyncedEntries(&trans, &handles);
+ EXPECT_EQ(2*batch_s+1, handles.size());
+ }
+}
+
+} // namespace syncer

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698