Index: chrome/common/extensions/docs/server2/templates/articles/sandboxingEval.html |
diff --git a/chrome/common/extensions/docs/server2/templates/articles/sandboxingEval.html b/chrome/common/extensions/docs/server2/templates/articles/sandboxingEval.html |
new file mode 100644 |
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ee26ea062650afbed1961bef5d04f12dee408998 |
--- /dev/null |
+++ b/chrome/common/extensions/docs/server2/templates/articles/sandboxingEval.html |
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ |
+<h1>Using eval in Chrome Extensions. Safely.</h1> |
+ |
+ |
+<p> |
+ Chrome's extension system enforces a fairly strict default |
+ <a href='contentSecurityPolicy.html'> |
+ <strong>Content Security Policy (CSP)</strong> |
+ </a>. The policy restrictions are straightforward: script must be moved |
+ out-of-line into separate JavaScript files, inline event handlers must be |
+ converted to use <code>addEventListener</code>, and <code>eval()</code> is |
+ disabled. Chrome Apps have an |
+ <a href='http://developer.chrome.com/trunk/apps/app_csp.html'>even more strict |
+ policy</a>, and we're quite happy with the security properties these policies |
+ provide. |
+</p> |
+ |
+<p> |
+ We recognize, however, that a variety of libraries use <code>eval()</code> and |
+ <code>eval</code>-like constructs such as <code>new Function()</code> for |
+ performance optimization and ease of expression. Templating libraries are |
+ especially prone to this style of implementation. While some (like |
+ <a href='http://angularjs.org/'>Angular.js</a>) support CSP out of the box, |
+ many popular frameworks haven't yet updated to a mechanism that is compatible |
+ with extensions' <code>eval</code>-less world. Removing support for that |
+ functionality has therefore proven <a href='http://crbug.com/107538'>more |
+ problematic than expected</a> for developers. |
+</p> |
+ |
+<p> |
+ This document introduces sandboxing as a safe mechanism to include these |
+ libraries in your projects without compromising on security. For brevity, |
+ we'll be using the term <em>extensions</em> throughout, but the concept |
+ applies equally to applications. |
+</p> |
+ |
+<h2>Why sandbox?</h2> |
+ |
+<p> |
+ <code>eval</code> is dangerous inside an extension because the code it |
+ executes has access to everything in the extension's high-permission |
+ environment. A slew of powerful <code>chrome.*</code> APIs are available that |
+ could severely impact a user's security and privacy; simple data exfiltration |
+ is the least of our worries. The solution on offer is a sandbox in which |
+ <code>eval</code> can execute code without access either to the extension's |
+ data or the extension's high-value APIs. No data, no APIs, no problem. |
+</p> |
+ |
+<p> |
+ We accomplish this by listing specific HTML files inside the extension package |
+ as being sandboxed. Whenever a sandboxed page is loaded, it will be moved to a |
+ <a href='http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/origin-0.html#sandboxed-origin-browsing-context-flag'>unique origin</a>, |
+ and will be denied access to <code>chrome.*</code> APIs. If we load this |
+ sandboxed page into our extension via an <code>iframe</code>, we can pass it |
+ messages, let it act upon those messages in some way, and wait for it to pass |
+ us back a result. This simple messaging mechanism gives us everything we need |
+ to safely include <code>eval</code>-driven code in our extension's workflow. |
+</p> |
+ |
+<h2>Creating and using a sandbox.</h2> |
+ |
+<p> |
+ If you'd like to dive straight into code, please grab the |
+ <a href='http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/samples.html#3c6dfba67f6a7480d931b5a4a646c151ad1a049b'>sandboxing |
+ sample extension and take off</a>. It's a working example of a tiny messaging |
+ API built on top of the <a href='http://handlebarsjs.com'>Handlebars</a> |
+ templating library, and it should give you everything you need to get going. |
+ For those of you who'd like a little more explanation, let's walk through that |
+ sample together here. |
+</p> |
+ |
+<h3>List files in manifest</h3> |
+ |
+<p> |
+ Each file that ought to be run inside a sandbox must be listed in the |
+ extension manifest by adding a <code>sandbox</code> property. This is a |
+ critical step, and it's easy to forget, so please double check that your |
+ sandboxed file is listed in the manifest. In this sample, we're sandboxing the |
+ file cleverly named "sandbox.html". The manifest entry looks like this: |
+</p> |
+ |
+<pre>{ |
+ ..., |
+ "sandbox": { |
+ "pages": ["sandbox.html"] |
+ }, |
+ ... |
+}</pre> |
+ |
+<h3>Load the sandboxed file</h3> |
+ |
+<p> |
+ In order to do something interesting with the sandboxed file, we need to load |
+ it in a context where it can be addressed by the extension's code. Here, |
+ <a href='http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/examples/howto/sandbox/sandbox.html'>sandbox.html</a> |
+ has been loaded into the extension's <a href='http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/dev/event_pages.html'>Event |
+ Page</a> (<a href='http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/examples/howto/sandbox/eventpage.html'>eventpage.html</a>) |
+ via an <code>iframe</code>. <a href='http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/examples/howto/sandbox/eventpage.js'>eventpage.js</a> |
+ contains code that sends a message into the sandbox whenever the browser |
+ action is clicked by finding the <code>iframe</code> on the page, and |
+ executing the <code>postMessage</code> method on its |
+ <code>contentWindow</code>. The message is an object containing two |
+ properties: <code>context</code> and <code>command</code>. We'll dive into |
+ both in a moment. |
+</p> |
+ |
+<pre>chrome.browserAction.onClicked.addListener(function() { |
+ var iframe = document.getElementById('theFrame'); |
+ var message = { |
+ command: 'render', |
+ context: {thing: 'world'} |
+ }; |
+ iframe.contentWindow.postMessage(message, '*'); |
+});</pre> |
+ |
+<p class="note"> |
+ For general information about the <code>postMessage</code> API, take a look at |
+ the <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/window.postMessage"> |
+ <code>postMessage</code> documentation on MDN |
+ </a>. It's quite complete and worth reading. In particular, note that data can |
+ only be passed back and forth if it's serializable. Functions, for instance, |
+ are not. |
+</p> |
+ |
+<h3>Do something dangerous</h3> |
+ |
+<p> |
+ When <code>sandbox.html</code> is loaded, it loads the Handlebars library, and |
+ creates and compiles an inline template in the way Handlebars suggests: |
+</p> |
+ |
+<pre><script src="handlebars-1.0.0.beta.6.js"></script> |
+ <script id="hello-world-template" type="text/x-handlebars-template"> |
+ <div class="entry"> |
+ <h1>Hello, {{thing}}!</h1> |
+ </div> |
+ </script> |
+ <script> |
+ var templates = []; |
+ var source = document.getElementById('hello-world-template').innerHTML; |
+ templates['hello'] = Handlebars.compile(source); |
+ </script></pre> |
+ |
+<p> |
+ This doesn't fail! Even though <code>Handlebars.compile</code> ends up using |
+ <code>new Function</code>, things work exactly as expected, and we end up with |
+ a compiled template in <code>templates[‘hello']</code>. |
+</p> |
+ |
+<h3>Pass the result back</h3> |
+ |
+<p> |
+ We'll make this template available for use by setting up a message listener |
+ that accepts commands from the Event Page. We'll use the <code>command</code> |
+ passed in to determine what ought to be done (you could imagine doing more |
+ than simply rendering; perhaps creating templates? Perhaps managing them in |
+ some way?), and the <code>context</code> will be passed into the template |
+ directly for rendering. The rendered HTML will be passed back to the Event |
+ Page so the extension can do something useful with it later on: |
+</p> |
+ |
+<pre>window.addEventListener('message', function(event) { |
+ var command = event.data.command; |
+ var name = event.data.name || 'hello'; |
+ switch(command) { |
+ case 'render': |
+ event.source.postMessage({ |
+ name: name, |
+ html: templates[name](event.data.context) |
+ }, event.origin); |
+ break; |
+ |
+ // case 'somethingElse': |
+ // ... |
+ } |
+});</pre> |
+ |
+<p> |
+ Back in the Event Page, we'll receive this message, and do something |
+ interesting with the <code>html</code> data we've been passed. In this case, |
+ we'll just echo it out via a <a href='http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/notifications.html'>Desktop |
+ Notification</a>, but it's entirely possible to use this HTML safely as part |
+ of the extension's UI. Inserting it via <code>innerHTML</code> doesn't pose a |
+ significant security risk, as even a complete compromise of the sandboxed code |
+ through some clever attack would be unable to inject dangerous script or |
+ plugin content into the high-permission extension context. |
+</p> |
+ |
+<p> |
+ This mechanism makes templating straightforward, but it of course isn't |
+ limited to templating. Any code that doesn't work out of the box under a |
+ strict Content Security Policy can be sandboxed; in fact, it's often useful |
+ to sandbox components of your extensions that <em>would</em> run correctly in |
+ order to restrict each piece of your program to the smallest set of privileges |
+ necessary for it to properly execute. The |
+ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBxv8SaX0gg">Writing Secure Web Apps |
+ and Chrome Extensions</a> presentation from Google I/O 2012 gives some good |
+ examples of these technique in action, and is worth 56 minutes of your time. |
+</p> |