Adding `chrome-extension` resources to the CSP relaxation documentation.

Adding `chrome-extension` resources to the CSP relaxation documentation.

BUG=139443
Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=148934

[Mike West, 2012-07-30 07:57:02]

This CL adds explicit mention of `chrome-extension` and
`chrome-extension-resource` to the extension CSP relaxation documentation. WDYT?

[Aaron Boodman, 2012-07-30 08:45:11]

lgtm

http://codereview.chromium.org/10823074/diff/1/chrome/common/extensions/docs/...
File chrome/common/extensions/docs/static/contentSecurityPolicy.html (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/10823074/diff/1/chrome/common/extensions/docs/...
chrome/common/extensions/docs/static/contentSecurityPolicy.html:234: not be
accepted. <code>HTTPS</code>, on the other hand, secures the resources'
I think it would be better to replace the last sentence with something like:

The currently allowed schemes are: https, chrome-extension, and
chrome-extension-resources.

[Mike West, 2012-07-30 09:02:30]

On 2012/07/30 08:45:11, Aaron Boodman wrote:
> lgtm
> 
>
http://codereview.chromium.org/10823074/diff/1/chrome/common/extensions/docs/...
> File chrome/common/extensions/docs/static/contentSecurityPolicy.html (right):
> 
>
http://codereview.chromium.org/10823074/diff/1/chrome/common/extensions/docs/...
> chrome/common/extensions/docs/static/contentSecurityPolicy.html:234: not be
> accepted. <code>HTTPS</code>, on the other hand, secures the resources'
> I think it would be better to replace the last sentence with something like:
> 
> The currently allowed schemes are: https, chrome-extension, and
> chrome-extension-resources.

Done. I'll land this shortly.

Thanks!