Slightly simplify third_party/libexif/README.chromium.

Slightly simplify third_party/libexif/README.chromium.

BUG=none
TEST=none
NOTRY=true

Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=148229

[kmadhusu, 2012-07-24 22:15:10]

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10808112/diff/1/third_party/libexif/RE...
File third_party/libexif/README.chromium (left):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10808112/diff/1/third_party/libexif/RE...
third_party/libexif/README.chromium:2: Short Name: libexif
I followed this template
(http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/third_party/README.chromium.t...).
Did the template change?

[Lei Zhang, 2012-07-24 22:23:38]

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10808112/diff/1/third_party/libexif/RE...
File third_party/libexif/README.chromium (left):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10808112/diff/1/third_party/libexif/RE...
third_party/libexif/README.chromium:2: Short Name: libexif
On 2012/07/24 22:15:10, kmadhusu wrote:
> I followed this template
>
(http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/third_party/README.chromium.t...).
> Did the template change?

No, but less than half of the README.chromium files have it. It feels redundant
in this case. The presubmit check says:

"Third party README files should contain either a 'Short Name' or a 'Name' which
is the name under which the package is distributed. Check
README.chromium.template for details."

[kmadhusu, 2012-07-24 22:25:15]

lgtm

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2012-07-24 22:32:20]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/thestig@chromium.org/10808112/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2012-07-24 22:33:12]

Change committed as 148229