Add test case for typed arrays slicing

test/mjsunit/typed-array-slice.js

 // Copyright 2011 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
 // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
 // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
 // met:
 //
 //     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
 //       notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
 //     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
 //       copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
 //       disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
 //       with the distribution.
 //     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
 //       contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
 //       from this software without specific prior written permission.
 //
 // THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
 // "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
 // LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
 // A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
 // OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
 // SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
 // LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
 // DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
 // THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
 // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
 // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
 
 // Flags: --allow-natives-syntax
 
-// Regression test for GVN on field loads.
+// This is a regression test for overlapping key and value registers.
 
-function bar() {}
+types = [Array, Int8Array, Uint8Array, Int16Array, Uint16Array, Int32Array,
+         Uint32Array, Uint8ClampedArray, Float32Array, Float64Array];
 
-// Make sure there is a transition on adding "bar" inobject property.
-var b = new bar();
-b.bar = "bar";
+results1 = [-2, -2, 254, -2, 65534, -2, 4294967294, 0, -2, -2];
+results2 = [undefined, -1, 255, -1, 65535, -1, 4294967295, 0, -1, -1];
+results3 = [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0];
+results4 = [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1];

[rossberg, 2012/07/02 10:40:21]

Could you declare all the above variables with 'var'?

 
-function test(a) {
-  var b = new Array(10);
-  for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
-    b[i] = new bar();
-  }
+const kElementCount = 40;
 
-  for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
-    b[i].bar = a.foo;
-  }
+function do_slice(a) {
+  return Array.prototype.slice.call(a, 4, 8);
 }
 
-// Create an object with fast backing store properties.
-var a = {};
-a.p1 = "";
-a.p2 = "";
-a.p3 = "";
-a.p4 = "";
-a.p5 = "";
-a.p6 = "";
-a.p7 = "";
-a.p8 = "";
-a.p9 = "";
-a.p10 = "";
-a.p11 = "";
-a.foo = "foo";
-for (var i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
- test(a);
+for (var t = 0; t < types.length; t++) {
+  var type = types[t];
+  var a = new type(kElementCount);
+  for (i = 0; i < kElementCount; ++i ) {

[rossberg, 2012/07/02 10:40:21]

This could take a 'var', too.

+    a[i] = i-6;
+  }
+  delete a[5];
+  var sliced = do_slice(a);
+  
+  %ClearFunctionTypeFeedback(do_slice);
+  assertEquals(results1[t], sliced[0]);
+  assertEquals(results2[t], sliced[1]);
+  assertEquals(results3[t], sliced[2]);
+  assertEquals(results4[t], sliced[3]);
 }
-%OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(test);
-test(a);
-
-test("");