Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(113)

Side by Side Diff: scripts/slave/recipes/bisect_test/example_bisect_results.expected/failed_test.json

Issue 1062583003: Adding config step to output the bisect config dictionary. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/tools/build.git@hax
Patch Set: Sorting keys. Created 5 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « scripts/slave/recipes/bisect_test/example_bisect_results.expected/failed_direction_test.json ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
OLDNEW
1 [ 1 [
2 { 2 {
3 "cmd": [ 3 "cmd": [
4 "echo",
5 "{\n \"bad_revision\": \"314017\", \n \"bug_id\": \"\", \n \"builder_ho st\": \"master4.golo.chromium.org\", \n \"builder_port\": \"8341\", \n \"comma nd\": \"src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release smoothness.tough_scrol ling_cases\", \n \"dummy_builds\": \"True\", \n \"good_revision\": \"314015\", \n \"gs_bucket\": \"chrome-perf\", \n \"max_time_minutes\": \"5\", \n \"metr ic\": \"mean_input_event_latency/mean_input_event_latency\", \n \"repeat_count\ ": \"2\", \n \"skip_gclient_ops\": \"True\", \n \"test_type\": \"perf\", \n \ "truncate_percent\": \"0\"\n}"
6 ],
7 "name": "config"
8 },
9 {
10 "cmd": [
4 "git", 11 "git",
5 "log", 12 "log",
6 "--format=hash:%H", 13 "--format=hash:%H",
7 "--grep", 14 "--grep",
8 "Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#314017}", 15 "Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#314017}",
9 "-1", 16 "-1",
10 "refs/heads/master" 17 "refs/heads/master"
11 ], 18 ],
12 "cwd": "[TMP_BASE]/bogus_tmp_1", 19 "cwd": "[TMP_BASE]/bogus_tmp_1",
13 "name": "resolving commit_pos 314017", 20 "name": "resolving commit_pos 314017",
(...skipping 48 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
62 "stdout": "/path/to/tmp/" 69 "stdout": "/path/to/tmp/"
63 }, 70 },
64 { 71 {
65 "cmd": [ 72 "cmd": [
66 "cat" 73 "cat"
67 ], 74 ],
68 "name": "Results", 75 "name": "Results",
69 "stdin": "\n===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====\nStatus: Failed\n\nTest Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release smoothness.tough_scrolling_cas es\nTest Metric: mean_input_event_latency/mean_input_event_latency\nRelative Cha nge: None\nEstimated Confidence: 0.99%\nRetested CL with revert: Not Implemented .\n===== WARNINGS =====\nThe following warnings were raised by the bisect job:\n \n * This is a demo warning\n===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====\nSubject : Some random CL\nAuthor : DummyAuthor, dummy@nowhere.com\nCommit description:\n A long desc ription for a CL.\nContaining multiple lines\nCommit : deadbeef\nDate : 01/0 1/2015\n\ncommit_pos revision_string mean_value std_err good_or_bad? tested? cul prit? \n\n==== INSTRUCTIONS TO REPRODUCE ====\nTo run locally:\n - Use the test command given under 'BISECT JOB RESULTS' above.\n - Consider using a profiler. P ass --profiler=list to list available profilers.\n\nTo reproduce on a performanc e try bot:\nsrc/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=<bot-name> smoothness.toug h_scrolling_cases\n(Where <bot-name> comes from tools/perf/run_benchmark --brows er=list)\n\nFor more details please visit\nhttps://sites.google.com/a/chromium.o rg/dev/developers/performance-try-bots\n\n| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/ developers/core-principles for Chrome's\n| X | policy on perf regressions. Con tact chrome-perf-dashboard-team with any\n| / \\ | questions or suggestions abou t bisecting. THANK YOU." 76 "stdin": "\n===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====\nStatus: Failed\n\nTest Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release smoothness.tough_scrolling_cas es\nTest Metric: mean_input_event_latency/mean_input_event_latency\nRelative Cha nge: None\nEstimated Confidence: 0.99%\nRetested CL with revert: Not Implemented .\n===== WARNINGS =====\nThe following warnings were raised by the bisect job:\n \n * This is a demo warning\n===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====\nSubject : Some random CL\nAuthor : DummyAuthor, dummy@nowhere.com\nCommit description:\n A long desc ription for a CL.\nContaining multiple lines\nCommit : deadbeef\nDate : 01/0 1/2015\n\ncommit_pos revision_string mean_value std_err good_or_bad? tested? cul prit? \n\n==== INSTRUCTIONS TO REPRODUCE ====\nTo run locally:\n - Use the test command given under 'BISECT JOB RESULTS' above.\n - Consider using a profiler. P ass --profiler=list to list available profilers.\n\nTo reproduce on a performanc e try bot:\nsrc/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=<bot-name> smoothness.toug h_scrolling_cases\n(Where <bot-name> comes from tools/perf/run_benchmark --brows er=list)\n\nFor more details please visit\nhttps://sites.google.com/a/chromium.o rg/dev/developers/performance-try-bots\n\n| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/ developers/core-principles for Chrome's\n| X | policy on perf regressions. Con tact chrome-perf-dashboard-team with any\n| / \\ | questions or suggestions abou t bisecting. THANK YOU."
70 } 77 }
71 ] 78 ]
OLDNEW
« no previous file with comments | « scripts/slave/recipes/bisect_test/example_bisect_results.expected/failed_direction_test.json ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698