Issue 10559062: Make sure we don't leak map transitions from AccessorPairs to the Javascript world.

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Issue 10559062: Make sure we don't leak map transitions from AccessorPairs to the Javascript world. (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 6 months ago by Toon Verwaest

Modified:
8 years, 6 months ago

Reviewers:
Michael Starzinger, danno

CC:
v8-dev

Base URL:
https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge

Visibility:
Public.

Make sure we don't leak map transitions from AccessorPairs to the Javascript world. BUG=133211 TEST=test/mjsunit/regress/regress-133211.js Committed: https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=11854

Created: 8 years, 6 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

		Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Delta from patch set	Stats (+14 lines, -22 lines)			Patch
	M	src/runtime.cc	View		1 chunk	+6 lines, -4 lines	0 comments	Download
	A +	test/mjsunit/regress/regress-133211.js	View	1	1 chunk	+8 lines, -18 lines	0 comments	Download

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)

Michael Starzinger

Drive-by-comment: Can we have a regression test?

8 years, 6 months ago (2012-06-19 10:02:21 UTC) #2

LGTM. Please merge to the 3.11 branch, too.