| Index: compiler/javatests/com/google/dart/compiler/parser/NegativeParserTest.java
|
| diff --git a/compiler/javatests/com/google/dart/compiler/parser/NegativeParserTest.java b/compiler/javatests/com/google/dart/compiler/parser/NegativeParserTest.java
|
| index 136d291c1bae3c7d3cc1ef17dd7dcb3dec68a106..f7bb7ca0c7ffbf62d2a52d7c49c9f8135530ee78 100644
|
| --- a/compiler/javatests/com/google/dart/compiler/parser/NegativeParserTest.java
|
| +++ b/compiler/javatests/com/google/dart/compiler/parser/NegativeParserTest.java
|
| @@ -951,6 +951,70 @@ public class NegativeParserTest extends CompilerTestCase {
|
| errEx(ParserErrorCode.BUILT_IN_IDENTIFIER_AS_TYPEDEF_NAME, 14, 9, 7));
|
| }
|
|
|
| + /**
|
| + * There is ambiguity in parsing function expression inside of initializer.
|
| + * <p>
|
| + * But we should be able to parse when function expression is inside of "new expression".
|
| + * <p>
|
| + * http://code.google.com/p/dart/issues/detail?id=2339
|
| + */
|
| + public void test_functionExpression_inInitializer_newExpression() {
|
| + parseExpectErrors(
|
| + Joiner.on("\n").join(
|
| + "// filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler",
|
| + "class A {",
|
| + " A(var p) {}",
|
| + "}",
|
| + "class B {",
|
| + " var f;",
|
| + " B() : f = new A(() => 42) {",
|
| + " }",
|
| + "}",
|
| + ""));
|
| + }
|
| +
|
| + /**
|
| + * There is ambiguity in parsing function expression inside of initializer.
|
| + * <p>
|
| + * But we should be able to parse when function expression is inside of "const expression".
|
| + * <p>
|
| + * http://code.google.com/p/dart/issues/detail?id=2339
|
| + */
|
| + public void test_functionExpression_inInitializer_constExpression() {
|
| + parseExpectErrors(
|
| + Joiner.on("\n").join(
|
| + "// filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler",
|
| + "class A {",
|
| + " const A(var p) {}",
|
| + "}",
|
| + "class B {",
|
| + " var f;",
|
| + " B() : f = const A(() => 42) {",
|
| + " }",
|
| + "}",
|
| + ""));
|
| + }
|
| +
|
| + /**
|
| + * There is ambiguity in parsing function expression inside of initializer.
|
| + * <p>
|
| + * But we should be able to parse when function expression is inside of "method invocation".
|
| + * <p>
|
| + * http://code.google.com/p/dart/issues/detail?id=2339
|
| + */
|
| + public void test_functionExpression_inInitializer_methodInvocation() {
|
| + parseExpectErrors(
|
| + Joiner.on("\n").join(
|
| + "// filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler",
|
| + "foo(var p) {}",
|
| + "class B {",
|
| + " var f;",
|
| + " B() : f = foo(() => 42) {",
|
| + " }",
|
| + "}",
|
| + ""));
|
| + }
|
| +
|
| public void test_qualifiedType_inForIn() {
|
| parseExpectErrors(Joiner.on("\n").join(
|
| "// filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler",
|
|
|