Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(61)

Issue 10399072: Allow multiple possibe error codes for the "status" parameter. (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 7 months ago by Nico
Modified:
8 years, 7 months ago
Reviewers:
Mark Mentovai
CC:
gyp-developer_googlegroups.com
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Allow multiple possibe error codes for the "status" parameter. Use this to make gyptest-objc-gc pass with both Xcode 3 and 4. Committed: https://code.google.com/p/gyp/source/detail?r=1385

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 3
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+11 lines, -14 lines) Patch
M test/lib/TestCommon.py View 1 chunk +10 lines, -13 lines 3 comments Download
M test/mac/gyptest-objc-gc.py View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
Nico
https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10399072/diff/1/test/lib/TestCommon.py File test/lib/TestCommon.py (left): https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10399072/diff/1/test/lib/TestCommon.py#oldcode192 test/lib/TestCommon.py:192: if os.name == 'posix': The two branches looked identical ...
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-05-17 20:31:57 UTC) #1
Mark Mentovai
LGTM https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10399072/diff/1/test/lib/TestCommon.py File test/lib/TestCommon.py (right): https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10399072/diff/1/test/lib/TestCommon.py#newcode196 test/lib/TestCommon.py:196: return _status(self) not in status OK to the ...
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-05-17 21:08:58 UTC) #2
Nico
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-05-17 21:29:36 UTC) #3
Thanks!

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10399072/diff/1/test/lib/TestCommon.py
File test/lib/TestCommon.py (right):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10399072/diff/1/test/lib/TestCommon.py...
test/lib/TestCommon.py:196: return _status(self) not in status
On 2012/05/17 21:08:58, Mark Mentovai wrote:
> OK to the reorganization, but could you be consistent with the indentation?
You
> used 2 here and for the next one, but 4 elsewhere.

Done. Huh, looks like this file doesn't use google style.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698