Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(918)

Unified Diff: content/browser/frame_host/render_frame_host_manager.cc

Issue 1036243003: PlzNavigate: Improvements to RFHM commit logic. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: content/browser/frame_host/render_frame_host_manager.cc
diff --git a/content/browser/frame_host/render_frame_host_manager.cc b/content/browser/frame_host/render_frame_host_manager.cc
index 29771b2ab65da73c748a60643a0634acce2ec5a2..207bcc0edc112d60dc4a22ac91e05fcf1e571c27 100644
--- a/content/browser/frame_host/render_frame_host_manager.cc
+++ b/content/browser/frame_host/render_frame_host_manager.cc
@@ -460,9 +460,14 @@ void RenderFrameHostManager::CommitPendingIfNecessary(
if (render_frame_host == speculative_render_frame_host_.get()) {
CommitPending();
} else if (render_frame_host == render_frame_host_.get()) {
- // TODO(carlosk): this code doesn't properly handle in-page navigation or
- // interwoven navigation requests.
- DCHECK(!speculative_render_frame_host_);
+ DCHECK(!should_reuse_web_ui_ || web_ui_);
+ // TODO(carlosk): this code might not handle interwoven navigation
clamy 2015/03/31 11:40:42 Could you add a comment explaining that even if th
carlosk 2015/03/31 14:19:39 Done.
+ // requests properly.
carlosk 2015/03/27 17:11:29 Due to the possibility of having multiple ongoing
clamy 2015/03/31 11:40:42 Yes we should maybe think about pausing a navigati
carlosk 2015/03/31 14:19:39 Let's talk offline about this as I don't understan
+ if (speculative_web_ui_ && !speculative_render_frame_host_) {
+ CommitPending();
+ } else {
+ CleanUpNavigation();
+ }
} else {
// No one else should be sending us a DidNavigate in this state.
DCHECK(false);
@@ -1637,8 +1642,14 @@ void RenderFrameHostManager::CommitPending() {
}
} else {
// PlzNavigate
- if (!should_reuse_web_ui_)
+ if (speculative_web_ui_) {
+ DCHECK(!should_reuse_web_ui_);
web_ui_.reset(speculative_web_ui_.release());
+ } else if (should_reuse_web_ui_) {
clamy 2015/03/31 11:40:42 At which point is should_reuse_web_ui_ reset?
carlosk 2015/03/31 14:19:39 You are right to bring this up: this is the place.
+ CHECK(web_ui_);
clamy 2015/03/31 11:40:42 I wonder if this should be a DCHECK seeing that al
carlosk 2015/03/31 14:19:39 Done.
+ } else {
+ web_ui_.reset();
+ }
carlosk 2015/03/27 17:11:30 This code does basically the same as the previous
DCHECK(!speculative_web_ui_);
}
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698