Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(540)

Issue 10332274: Fix NTP issue because of -webkit-flexbox -> -webkit-flex rename (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 7 months ago by Dan Beam
Modified:
8 years, 7 months ago
Reviewers:
Evan Stade
CC:
chromium-reviews, dbeam+watch-ntp_chromium.org, estade+watch_chromium.org, arv (Not doing code reviews), Patrick Dubroy
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Fix NTP issue because of -webkit-flexbox -> -webkit-flex rename. R=estade@chromium.org BUG=None (yet) TEST=The vertical separator between recently close and webstore footer link works. Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=138113

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+2 lines, -2 lines) Patch
M chrome/browser/resources/ntp4/new_tab.css View 1 chunk +2 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4 (0 generated)
Dan Beam
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-05-21 18:24:19 UTC) #1
Evan Stade
lgtm -- Evan Stade On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:24 AM, <dbeam@chromium.org> wrote: > ...
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-05-21 18:25:12 UTC) #2
tony
FWIW, using flex-order instead of modifying the DOM to change the order of elements may ...
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-05-21 23:09:34 UTC) #3
Evan Stade
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-05-22 00:57:39 UTC) #4
On 2012/05/21 23:09:34, tony wrote:
> FWIW, using flex-order instead of modifying the DOM to change the order of
> elements may cause problems if you try to select text (doesn't seem to apply
> here) or if you try to tab through the elements.  The tab order follows the
> document order, which may not match the visual order.

the tab order is only affected when one of the two elements is not visible, so
you can't tab to it anyway. So we're safe in this case.

I still have the same opinion that I expressed at the bottom of
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62664 although it appears that I was
feeling annoyed at the time I wrote it and perhaps discussed the issue a little
too passionately.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698