Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(261)

Issue 10270004: cocoa/bookmarks: Do not rely on Browser::tabstrip_model() accessor. (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 7 months ago by tfarina
Modified:
8 years, 7 months ago
Reviewers:
Nico
CC:
chromium-reviews
Visibility:
Public.

Description

cocoa/bookmarks: Do not rely on Browser::tabstrip_model() accessor. This simplifies BookmarkAllTabsController::UpdateActiveTabPairs() function. R=thakis@chromium.org Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=134855

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 2 : nico review -> contents #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+3 lines, -6 lines) Patch
M chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/bookmarks/bookmark_all_tabs_controller.mm View 1 1 chunk +3 lines, -6 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4 (0 generated)
tfarina
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-04-29 20:34:57 UTC) #1
Nico
s/By doing this, this patch greatly simplifies/This simplifies/ in the CL description. http://codereview.chromium.org/10270004/diff/1/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/bookmarks/bookmark_all_tabs_controller.mm File chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/bookmarks/bookmark_all_tabs_controller.mm ...
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-04-30 15:23:47 UTC) #2
Nico
Err, and LGTM :-)
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-04-30 15:23:56 UTC) #3
tfarina
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-04-30 16:59:12 UTC) #4
On 2012/04/30 15:23:47, Nico wrote:
> s/By doing this, this patch greatly simplifies/This simplifies/ in the CL
> description.
> 
Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/10270004/diff/1/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/bookma...
File chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/bookmarks/bookmark_all_tabs_controller.mm (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/10270004/diff/1/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/bookma...
chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/bookmarks/bookmark_all_tabs_controller.mm:49:
WebContents* wc = browser->GetWebContentsAt(i);
On 2012/04/30 15:23:47, Nico wrote:
> nit: The styleguide discourages abbreviations. Does `contents` work? (I know
> that the old name was wc too)

Done.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698