MIPS: Add isolate accessor to AccessorInfo and Arguments.

MIPS: Add isolate accessor to AccessorInfo and Arguments.

Port r11306 (36b58f7).

Original commit message:

This passes the isolate through to API callback functions so that it is
available through AccessorInfo and Arguments. This allows bindings to
avoid unnecessary TLS lookups to retrieve the current isolate.

BUG=
TEST=

Committed: https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=11319

[Michael Starzinger, 2012-04-13 11:41:50]

LGTM (with one comment). I'll land it once comment is addressed.

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10083001/diff/1/src/mips/stub-cache-mi...
File src/mips/stub-cache-mips.cc (right):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10083001/diff/1/src/mips/stub-cache-mi...
src/mips/stub-cache-mips.cc:1362: __ Push(receiver, holder_reg);
For MIPS this whole if-else-block seems to be unnecessary. Can we just use "__
Push(receiver, holder_reg)" instead of lines 1357 to 1363?

[kalmard, 2012-04-13 11:51:54]

Thanks for the review, I updated the CL based on your suggestion.

http://codereview.chromium.org/10083001/diff/1/src/mips/stub-cache-mips.cc
File src/mips/stub-cache-mips.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/10083001/diff/1/src/mips/stub-cache-mips.cc#ne...
src/mips/stub-cache-mips.cc:1362: __ Push(receiver, holder_reg);
On 2012/04/13 11:41:50, Michael Starzinger wrote:
> For MIPS this whole if-else-block seems to be unnecessary. Can we just use "__
> Push(receiver, holder_reg)" instead of lines 1357 to 1363?
Done. Not sure how I missed this.

[Michael Starzinger, 2012-04-13 13:44:38]

Landed as r11319.