Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(224)

Unified Diff: src/hydrogen.cc

Issue 10032029: Eliminate redundant array bound checks (checks already performed earlier in the DT). (Closed) Base URL: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge
Patch Set: Fixed style issues and shortened the phase name to help Golem understand it. Created 8 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « src/hydrogen.h ('k') | src/hydrogen-instructions.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: src/hydrogen.cc
diff --git a/src/hydrogen.cc b/src/hydrogen.cc
index f9d41910f31edb9f1bbbda6ac22ec0ce5935d1c0..a6504345dee066465b07464e3ac8c912479e4aa2 100644
--- a/src/hydrogen.cc
+++ b/src/hydrogen.cc
@@ -2561,31 +2561,230 @@ HGraph* HGraphBuilder::CreateGraph() {
HStackCheckEliminator sce(graph());
sce.Process();
- // Replace the results of check instructions with the original value, if the
- // result is used. This is safe now, since we don't do code motion after this
- // point. It enables better register allocation since the value produced by
- // check instructions is really a copy of the original value.
- graph()->ReplaceCheckedValues();
+ graph()->EliminateRedundantBoundsChecks();
return graph();
}
-
-void HGraph::ReplaceCheckedValues() {
- HPhase phase("H_Replace checked values", this);
- for (int i = 0; i < blocks()->length(); ++i) {
- HInstruction* instr = blocks()->at(i)->first();
- while (instr != NULL) {
- if (instr->IsBoundsCheck()) {
- // Replace all uses of the checked value with the original input.
- ASSERT(instr->UseCount() > 0);
- instr->ReplaceAllUsesWith(HBoundsCheck::cast(instr)->index());
+// We try to "factor up" HBoundsCheck instructions towards the root of the
+// dominator tree.
+// For now we handle checks where the index is like "exp + int32value".
+// If in the dominator tree we check "exp + v1" and later (dominated)
+// "exp + v2", if v2 <= v1 we can safely remove the second check, and if
+// v2 > v1 we can use v2 in the 1st check and again remove the second.
+// To do so we keep a dictionary of all checks where the key if the pair
+// "exp, length".
+// The class BoundsCheckKey represents this key.
+class BoundsCheckKey : public ZoneObject {
+ public:
+ HValue* IndexBase() const {return index_base_;}
+ HValue* Length() const {return length_;}
+
+ uint32_t Hash() {
+ return static_cast<uint32_t>(index_base_->Hashcode() ^ length_->Hashcode());
+ }
+
+ static BoundsCheckKey* Create(Zone* zone,
+ HBoundsCheck* check,
+ int32_t* offset) {
+ HValue* index_base = NULL;
+ HConstant* constant = NULL;
+ if (check->index()->IsAdd()) {
+ HAdd* index = HAdd::cast(check->index());
+ if (index->left()->IsConstant()) {
+ constant = HConstant::cast(index->left());
+ index_base = index->right();
+ } else if (index->right()->IsConstant()) {
+ constant = HConstant::cast(index->right());
+ index_base = index->left();
}
- instr = instr->next();
+ }
+
+ if (constant != NULL && constant->HasInteger32Value()) {
+ *offset = constant->Integer32Value();
+ } else {
+ *offset = 0;
+ index_base = check->index();
+ }
+ return new(zone) BoundsCheckKey(index_base, check->length());
+ }
+
+ private:
+ BoundsCheckKey(HValue* index_base, HValue* length) {
+ index_base_ = index_base;
+ length_ = length;
+ }
+
+ HValue* index_base_;
+ HValue* length_;
+};
+
fschneider 2012/04/18 09:42:18 Two lines space here.
Massi 2012/04/23 15:19:19 Done.
+// Data about each HBoundsCheck that can be eliminated or moved.
+// It is the "value" in the dictionary indexed by "base-index, length"
+// (the key is BoundsCheckKey).
+// We scan the code with a dominator tree traversal.
+// Traversing the dominator tree we keep a stack (implemented as a singly
+// linked list) of "data" for each basic block that contains a relevant check
+// with the same key (the dictionary holds the head of the list).
+// We also keep all the "data" created for a given basic block in a list, and
+// use it to "clean up" the dictionary when backtracking in the dominator tree
+// traversal.
+// Doing this each dictionary entry always directly points to the check that
+// is dominating the code being examined now.
+// We also track the current "offset" of the index expression and use it to
+// decide if any check is already "covered" (so it can be removed) or not.
+class BoundsCheckBbData: public ZoneObject {
+ public:
+ BoundsCheckKey* Key() { return key_; }
+ int32_t Offset() { return offset_; }
+ HBasicBlock* BasicBlock() { return basic_block_; }
+ HBoundsCheck* Check() { return check_; }
+ BoundsCheckBbData* NextInBasicBlock() { return next_in_bb_; }
+ BoundsCheckBbData* FatherInDominatorTree() { return father_in_dt_; }
+
+ void CoverCheck(HBoundsCheck* new_check,
+ int32_t new_offset) {
+ ASSERT(new_check->index()->representation().IsInteger32());
+ HConstant* new_constant =
+ new HConstant(Handle<Object>(Smi::FromInt(new_offset)),
+ Representation::Integer32());
+ if (added_index_ == NULL) {
+ new_constant->InsertBefore(Check());
+ added_index_ =
+ new(BasicBlock()->zone()) HAdd(NULL,
+ Key()->IndexBase(),
+ new_constant);
+ added_index_->AssumeRepresentation(new_check->index()->representation());
+ added_index_->InsertBefore(Check());
+ } else {
+ new_constant->InsertBefore(added_index_);
+ added_offset_->DeleteAndReplaceWith(new_constant);
+ }
+ added_offset_ = new_constant;
+ Check()->SetOperandAt(0, added_index_);
+ new_check->DeleteAndReplaceWith(NULL);
+ offset_ = new_offset;
+ }
+
+ BoundsCheckBbData(BoundsCheckKey* key,
+ int32_t offset,
+ HBasicBlock* bb,
+ HBoundsCheck* check,
+ BoundsCheckBbData* next_in_bb,
+ BoundsCheckBbData* father_in_dt) :
+ key_(key),
+ offset_(offset),
+ basic_block_(bb),
+ check_(check),
+ added_offset_(NULL),
+ added_index_(NULL),
+ next_in_bb_(next_in_bb),
+ father_in_dt_(father_in_dt) { }
+
+ private:
+ BoundsCheckKey* key_;
+ int32_t offset_;
+ HBasicBlock* basic_block_;
+ HBoundsCheck* check_;
+ HConstant* added_offset_;
+ HAdd* added_index_;
+ BoundsCheckBbData* next_in_bb_;
+ BoundsCheckBbData* father_in_dt_;
+};
+
fschneider 2012/04/18 09:42:18 Two lines space here.
Massi 2012/04/23 15:19:19 Done.
+static bool BoundsCheckKeyMatch(void* key1, void* key2) {
+ BoundsCheckKey* k1 = static_cast<BoundsCheckKey*>(key1);
+ BoundsCheckKey* k2 = static_cast<BoundsCheckKey*>(key2);
+
+ return k1->IndexBase() == k2->IndexBase() && k1->Length() == k2->Length();
+}
+
fschneider 2012/04/18 09:42:18 Two lines space here.
Massi 2012/04/23 15:19:19 Done.
+class BoundsCheckTable : private ZoneHashMap {
+ public:
+ BoundsCheckBbData** LookupOrInsert(BoundsCheckKey* key) {
+ return reinterpret_cast<BoundsCheckBbData**>(
+ &(Lookup(key, key->Hash(), true)->value));
+ }
+
+ void Insert(BoundsCheckKey* key, BoundsCheckBbData* data) {
+ Lookup(key, key->Hash(), true)->value = data;
+ }
+
+ void Delete(BoundsCheckKey* key) {
+ Remove(key, key->Hash());
+ }
+
+ BoundsCheckTable() : ZoneHashMap(BoundsCheckKeyMatch) {
+ }
+};
+
fschneider 2012/04/18 09:42:18 Two lines space here.
Massi 2012/04/23 15:19:19 Done.
+// Eliminates checks in bb and recursively in the dominated blocks.
+// Also replace the results of check instructions with the original value, if
+// the result is used. This is safe now, since we don't do code motion after
+// this point. It enables better register allocation since the value produced
+// by check instructions is really a copy of the original value.
+void HGraph::EliminateRedundantBoundsChecks(HBasicBlock* bb,
+ BoundsCheckTable* table) {
+ BoundsCheckBbData* bb_data_list = NULL;
+
+ for (HInstruction* i = bb->first(); i != NULL; i = i->next()) {
+ if (!i->IsBoundsCheck()) continue;
+
+ HBoundsCheck* check = HBoundsCheck::cast(i);
+ check->ReplaceAllUsesWith(check->index());
+ isolate()->counters()->array_bounds_checks_seen()->Increment();
+ int32_t offset;
+ // TODO(mmassi): allocate key only when we create a new table entry...
fschneider 2012/04/18 09:42:18 If we plan to implement the TODO, we usually creat
+ BoundsCheckKey* key =
+ BoundsCheckKey::Create(bb->zone(), check, &offset);
+ BoundsCheckBbData** data_p = table->LookupOrInsert(key);
+ BoundsCheckBbData* data = *data_p;
+ if (data == NULL) {
+ bb_data_list = new(bb->zone()) BoundsCheckBbData(key,
+ offset,
+ bb,
+ check,
+ bb_data_list,
+ NULL);
+ *data_p = bb_data_list;
+ } else if (offset <= data->Offset()) {
+ check->DeleteAndReplaceWith(NULL);
+ isolate()->counters()->array_bounds_checks_removed()->Increment();
+ } else if (data->BasicBlock() == bb) {
+ data->CoverCheck(check, offset);
+ isolate()->counters()->array_bounds_checks_removed()->Increment();
+ } else {
+ bb_data_list = new(bb->zone()) BoundsCheckBbData(key,
+ offset,
+ bb,
+ check,
+ bb_data_list,
+ data);
+ table->Insert(key, bb_data_list);
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < bb->dominated_blocks()->length(); ++i) {
+ EliminateRedundantBoundsChecks(bb->dominated_blocks()->at(i), table);
+ }
+
+ for (BoundsCheckBbData* data = bb_data_list;
+ data != NULL;
+ data = data->NextInBasicBlock()) {
+ if (data->FatherInDominatorTree()) {
+ table->Insert(data->Key(), data->FatherInDominatorTree());
+ } else {
+ table->Delete(data->Key());
}
}
}
fschneider 2012/04/18 09:42:18 Two lines space here.
Massi 2012/04/23 15:19:19 Done.
+void HGraph::EliminateRedundantBoundsChecks() {
+ HPhase phase("H_Eliminate bounds checks", this);
+ AssertNoAllocation no_gc;
+ BoundsCheckTable checks_table;
+ EliminateRedundantBoundsChecks(entry_block(), &checks_table);
+}
HInstruction* HGraphBuilder::AddInstruction(HInstruction* instr) {
ASSERT(current_block() != NULL);
« no previous file with comments | « src/hydrogen.h ('k') | src/hydrogen-instructions.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698