Update status file.

Update status file.

Committed: https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=6358

[floitsch, 2012-04-04 19:33:54]

Adding srdjan for the co19-runtime.status file changes.

Note: int.toStringAs{Exponential|Fixed|Precision} currently just invoke
double.toStringAs(...). I think this should change, but since the numbers in the
test-case can be converted to double without loss of precision the issues filed
against co19 will survive potential changes to the function implementation.

[ahe, 2012-04-10 12:36:31]

LGTM!

Thanks for keeping it tidy!

Cheers,
Peter

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9961003/diff/8001/tests/language/langu...
File tests/language/language-leg.status (right):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9961003/diff/8001/tests/language/langu...
tests/language/language-leg.status:69: ListLiteral4Test: Fail # Illegal
argument(s): 0 -- tests dynamic type checks.
When you say "dynamic type checks" do you mean "developer mode" or
"is-operator"?

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9961003/diff/8001/tests/language/langu...
tests/language/language-leg.status:206: ExpectTest: Fail, OK # Tests string
(non-)canonicalization.
I don't understand why this is OK to fail. Is the test bad?

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9961003/diff/8001/tests/language/langu...
tests/language/language-leg.status:213: FinalSyntaxTest/none: Fail, Ok # Uses
deprecated "StrConstant + StrConstant".
This sounds like a bad test. Did you file a bug?

[floitsch, 2012-04-10 14:26:57]

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9961003/diff/8001/tests/language/langu...
File tests/language/language-leg.status (right):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9961003/diff/8001/tests/language/langu...
tests/language/language-leg.status:69: ListLiteral4Test: Fail # Illegal
argument(s): 0 -- tests dynamic type checks.
On 2012/04/10 12:36:31, ahe wrote:
> When you say "dynamic type checks" do you mean "developer mode" or
> "is-operator"?

changed to 'checked mode test'.

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9961003/diff/8001/tests/language/langu...
tests/language/language-leg.status:206: ExpectTest: Fail, OK # Tests string
(non-)canonicalization.
On 2012/04/10 12:36:31, ahe wrote:
> I don't understand why this is OK to fail. Is the test bad?

Reworded.

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9961003/diff/8001/tests/language/langu...
tests/language/language-leg.status:213: FinalSyntaxTest/none: Fail, Ok # Uses
deprecated "StrConstant + StrConstant".
On 2012/04/10 12:36:31, ahe wrote:
> This sounds like a bad test. Did you file a bug?

No. But this will not be missed during the + removal.

[ngeoffray, 2012-04-16 15:00:10]

LGTM!