Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(361)

Issue 9887003: Update reasons for some failing tests. (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 9 months ago by floitsch
Modified:
8 years, 9 months ago
Reviewers:
ahe
CC:
reviews_dartlang.org, ngeoffray
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Update reasons for some failing tests. Also remove status-file lines for non-existing tests. Committed: https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=5966

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : Another status update. #

Patch Set 3 : more updates #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 4 : Address comment. #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+5 lines, -7 lines) Patch
M tests/language/language-leg.status View 1 2 3 3 chunks +5 lines, -7 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5 (0 generated)
floitsch
8 years, 9 months ago (2012-03-28 23:07:12 UTC) #1
floitsch
more updates.
8 years, 9 months ago (2012-03-29 01:17:38 UTC) #2
floitsch
two other tests.
8 years, 9 months ago (2012-03-29 01:33:59 UTC) #3
ahe
LGTM! Thank you for keeping it tidy! Cheers, Peter https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9887003/diff/4002/tests/language/language-leg.status File tests/language/language-leg.status (right): https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9887003/diff/4002/tests/language/language-leg.status#newcode211 tests/language/language-leg.status:211: ...
8 years, 9 months ago (2012-03-29 05:13:01 UTC) #4
floitsch
8 years, 9 months ago (2012-03-29 05:30:41 UTC) #5
https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9887003/diff/4002/tests/language/langu...
File tests/language/language-leg.status (right):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9887003/diff/4002/tests/language/langu...
tests/language/language-leg.status:211: RegExp3Test: Fail, OK # Expects
exception from RegExp constructor.
On 2012/03/29 05:13:02, ahe wrote:
> Well, the problem is still that the test expects that a *const* constructor
> throws an exception. However, the const constructor cannot throw an exception
> unless we add additional magic to the language.

Ok. reverted.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698