Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(16)

Issue 9480001: Support named ctors. (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 10 months ago by antonm
Modified:
8 years, 10 months ago
Reviewers:
podivilov
CC:
reviews_dartlang.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 5

Patch Set 2 : Rebaseline #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+17 lines, -9 lines) Patch
M client/dom/scripts/systemnative.py View 1 4 chunks +15 lines, -4 lines 0 comments Download
M client/dom/src/native_FactoryProvidersImplementation.dart View 1 chunk +2 lines, -4 lines 0 comments Download
M client/tests/client/client.status View 1 chunk +0 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4 (0 generated)
antonm
8 years, 10 months ago (2012-02-27 15:23:22 UTC) #1
podivilov
http://codereview.chromium.org/9480001/diff/1/client/dom/scripts/systemnative.py File client/dom/scripts/systemnative.py (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/9480001/diff/1/client/dom/scripts/systemnative.py#newcode291 client/dom/scripts/systemnative.py:291: ' Document* document = domWindow->document();\n') Our constructors seems to ...
8 years, 10 months ago (2012-02-27 15:53:48 UTC) #2
antonm
http://codereview.chromium.org/9480001/diff/1/client/dom/scripts/systemnative.py File client/dom/scripts/systemnative.py (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/9480001/diff/1/client/dom/scripts/systemnative.py#newcode291 client/dom/scripts/systemnative.py:291: ' Document* document = domWindow->document();\n') I am not sure. ...
8 years, 10 months ago (2012-02-27 15:59:36 UTC) #3
podivilov
8 years, 10 months ago (2012-02-27 16:59:49 UTC) #4
lgtm

http://codereview.chromium.org/9480001/diff/1/client/dom/scripts/systemnative.py
File client/dom/scripts/systemnative.py (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/9480001/diff/1/client/dom/scripts/systemnative...
client/dom/scripts/systemnative.py:750: if
idl_argument.ext_attrs.get('Optional') == 'DefaultIsNullString':
On 2012/02/27 15:59:36, antonm wrote:
> On 2012/02/27 15:53:48, podivilov wrote:
> > This code is not actually used, do we really want to keep it?
> 
> Why it's not used?  It's need, e.g., to make (most probably slightly
incorrect)
> test to pass

Ok, seems like it is used for constructor parameters.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698