Remove support for obsolete syntax of factory methods and default classes.

Remove support for obsolete syntax of factory methods and default classes.
Committed: https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=3578

[hausner, 2012-01-24 22:08:36]

LGTM.

[zundel, 2012-01-24 22:52:40]

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9285031/diff/6001/tests/language/src/N...
File tests/language/src/NonParameterizedFactory2Test.dart (left):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9285031/diff/6001/tests/language/src/N...
tests/language/src/NonParameterizedFactory2Test.dart:5: interface Interface<T>
default Factory {
I'm not seeing a change to the spec since I last worked on the default class
specification, did you confirm with Gilad?

At the time,  this syntax was OK with the new 'default' syntax - in fact, this
test is to show that you can use the non-parameterized type with a parameterized
default class if you like.  



https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/pub?id=1RqcfL64kw5SJkyut6eN34d7...

  "If the default factory clause of I includes a list of type parameters tps,
then tps must be identical to the type parameters given in the type declaration
of F, or a compile-time error occurs."

[regis, 2012-01-24 23:15:52]

Good point. I was not aware of the fact that the list of type parameters can be
omitted in the default factory clause. I definitely remember a time where it had
to match exactly and I do not know when that changed. I'll double-check with
Gilad before allowing it again.

Thanks,
Regis

On 2012/01/24 22:52:40, zundel wrote:
>
https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9285031/diff/6001/tests/language/src/N...
> File tests/language/src/NonParameterizedFactory2Test.dart (left):
> 
>
https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9285031/diff/6001/tests/language/src/N...
> tests/language/src/NonParameterizedFactory2Test.dart:5: interface Interface<T>
> default Factory {
> I'm not seeing a change to the spec since I last worked on the default class
> specification, did you confirm with Gilad?
> 
> At the time,  this syntax was OK with the new 'default' syntax - in fact, this
> test is to show that you can use the non-parameterized type with a
parameterized
> default class if you like.  
> 
> 
> 
>
https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/pub?id=1RqcfL64kw5SJkyut6eN34d7...
> 
>   "If the default factory clause of I includes a list of type parameters tps,
> then tps must be identical to the type parameters given in the type
declaration
> of F, or a compile-time error occurs."