Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(13)

Issue 9231021: Several fixes needed to reuse JS DOM interfaces in dartium. (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 11 months ago by podivilov
Modified:
8 years, 11 months ago
Reviewers:
vsm, sra1
CC:
reviews_dartlang.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Several fixes needed to reuse JS DOM interfaces in dartium. - make generator output dir configurable - templates dir should be relative to dartdomgenerator.py rather then current directory - "operator" is keyword and could not be an attribute name R=sra@google.com,vsm@google.com Committed: https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=3454

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+30 lines, -18 lines) Patch
M client/dom/idl/dart/dart.idl View 2 chunks +12 lines, -2 lines 2 comments Download
M client/dom/scripts/dartdomgenerator.py View 4 chunks +12 lines, -12 lines 0 comments Download
M client/dom/scripts/dartgenerator.py View 3 chunks +6 lines, -4 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
podivilov
8 years, 11 months ago (2012-01-17 15:15:51 UTC) #1
sra1
lgtm http://codereview.chromium.org/9231021/diff/1/client/dom/idl/dart/dart.idl File client/dom/idl/dart/dart.idl (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/9231021/diff/1/client/dom/idl/dart/dart.idl#newcode184 client/dom/idl/dart/dart.idl:184: [Suppressed] readonly attribute SVGAnimatedEnumeration operator; Is this necessary? ...
8 years, 11 months ago (2012-01-17 22:13:30 UTC) #2
podivilov
8 years, 11 months ago (2012-01-20 11:26:58 UTC) #3
Thanks!

http://codereview.chromium.org/9231021/diff/1/client/dom/idl/dart/dart.idl
File client/dom/idl/dart/dart.idl (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/9231021/diff/1/client/dom/idl/dart/dart.idl#ne...
client/dom/idl/dart/dart.idl:184: [Suppressed] readonly attribute
SVGAnimatedEnumeration operator;
On 2012/01/17 22:13:30, sra1 wrote:
> Is this necessary? 'operator' is a pseudo-keyword.
> 
> See
>
http://codereview.chromium.org/9212018/diff/4/tests/language/src/PseudoKWTest...
> 
> If there is a problem with 'operator', can you put in a 'TODO' to remove after
> the problem is fixed?

Reverted.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698