Format enums. Fix #120.

Format enums. Fix #120.

BUG=https://github.com/dart-lang/dart_style/issues/120
R=pquitslund@google.com

Committed: 6a0abc7c21f3b3a1812977ee12ea81cab4cfca95

[Bob Nystrom, 2015-01-08 01:13:00]

rnystrom@google.com changed reviewers:
+ pquitslund@google.com

[Bob Nystrom, 2015-01-08 01:13:01]

Before I land this, I'm going to send out another patch to bump the version of
dart_style and publish it. Then this will be the first change for the next
(patch) version.

I'll coordinate with you to bring in the new hotness to the repo when it makes
sense.

[pquitslund, 2015-01-08 04:49:26]

LGTM.

Good stuff.  As for revving the # in DEPS, do keep me posted, though in the
short term being slightly behind won't slow down integration.

Cheers!

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/844653002/diff/1/lib/src/dart_formatte...
File lib/src/dart_formatter.dart (right):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/844653002/diff/1/lib/src/dart_formatte...
lib/src/dart_formatter.dart:150: parser.parseEnum = true;
Depending on what version of the analyzer we're pulling in, these bits may not
be necessary.  IOW: they may be on by default.

[Bob Nystrom, 2015-01-08 17:35:35]

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/844653002/diff/1/lib/src/dart_formatte...
File lib/src/dart_formatter.dart (right):

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/844653002/diff/1/lib/src/dart_formatte...
lib/src/dart_formatter.dart:150: parser.parseEnum = true;
On 2015/01/08 04:49:25, pquitslund wrote:
> Depending on what version of the analyzer we're pulling in, these bits may not
> be necessary.  IOW: they may be on by default.

Right now dart_style is constrained to an older version of the analyzer that
does still require these. Today, if you have the time, you and Brian and I
should sort out what constraint dart_style should have. I'll follow up with you
guys on the other email thread about it.

[Bob Nystrom, 2015-01-08 17:37:11]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) manually as
6a0abc7c21f3b3a1812977ee12ea81cab4cfca95 (presubmit successful).